| Revision as of 16:56, 14 June 2006 editTimrollpickering (talk | contribs)Administrators353,825 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:38, 13 January 2007 edit undoStamboul (talk | contribs)156 edits Tom GarvinNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| There's confusion about whether he was born in 1889 or c1900 throughout the article - it describes hims as being only 59 when he succeeded deV and 71 when he died but that doesn't match his given birthdate. Which is right? ] 16:56, 14 June 2006 (UTC) | There's confusion about whether he was born in 1889 or c1900 throughout the article - it describes hims as being only 59 when he succeeded deV and 71 when he died but that doesn't match his given birthdate. Which is right? ] 16:56, 14 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==]== | |||
| I added a reference and ISBN for Tom Garvin's (Professor of politics at UCD) book which has just been removed. Reasons for removal, please, or put it back.] 14:38, 13 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:38, 13 January 2007
WetmanAuthenticity check: A search reveals that the phrase "regarded by many" appears in the text. Is the phrase a symptom of a dubious statement? Could a source be quoted instead? Perhaps the "many" could be identified? Might text be edited to more genuinely reflect specific facts?
Age
There's confusion about whether he was born in 1889 or c1900 throughout the article - it describes hims as being only 59 when he succeeded deV and 71 when he died but that doesn't match his given birthdate. Which is right? Timrollpickering 16:56, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Tom Garvin
I added a reference and ISBN for Tom Garvin's (Professor of politics at UCD) book which has just been removed. Reasons for removal, please, or put it back.Stamboul 14:38, 13 January 2007 (UTC)