| Revision as of 10:01, 17 June 2006 editGiano (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users20,173 editsm →[]: slow down← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:02, 17 June 2006 edit undoGiano (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users20,173 editsm →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| *You may wish to browse through ] (and the javascript checklist; see the last paragraph in the lead) for further ideas. | *You may wish to browse through ] (and the javascript checklist; see the last paragraph in the lead) for further ideas. | ||
| *Thanks, '']'' <sub>]</sub> 00:59, 17 June 2006 (UTC) | *Thanks, '']'' <sub>]</sub> 00:59, 17 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *Could I just point out, this is in fact one of a series of pages on 19th century revival styles which like this page are still under construction |
*Could I just point out, this is in fact one of a series of pages on 19th century revival styles which like this page are still under construction. This is still being researched, and is a long way from completion. Hence PR, or indeed any other form of review is very premature! ] | ] 10:01, 17 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 10:02, 17 June 2006
Neo-Renaissance
Good article which the Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Architecture would like to see improved.--Mcginnly 23:51, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program. They may or may not be accurate for the article in question (due to possible javascript errors/uniqueness of articles). If the following suggestions are completely incorrect about the article, please drop a note on my talk page.
- Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at WP:LEAD. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.
- Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSDATE, months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
- This has been fixed thanks to bobblewik's tool. Joelito (talk) 03:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City. (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
- Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space -
between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18mm, use 18 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 18 mm.
- Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL.
- Done. Joelito (talk) 03:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links.
- Done. Joelito (talk) 03:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
- it has been
- correctly
- might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already too, please
strikethis comment).
- As is done in WP:FOOTNOTE, for footnotes, the footnote should be located right after the punctuation mark, such that there is no space inbetween. For example, change blah blah . to blah blah.
- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of Misplaced Pages's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a.
- You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions (and the javascript checklist; see the last paragraph in the lead) for further ideas.
- Thanks, Andy t 00:59, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- Could I just point out, this is in fact one of a series of pages on 19th century revival styles which like this page are still under construction. This is still being researched, and is a long way from completion. Hence PR, or indeed any other form of review is very premature! Giano | talk 10:01, 17 June 2006 (UTC)