Misplaced Pages

User talk:Coffee: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:34, 19 January 2014 editRomanSpa (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,301 edits →A brownie for you! (Because brownies are good with coffee...): new WikiLove message← Previous edit Revision as of 06:28, 20 January 2014 edit undoMikepellerin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,299 edits →Rollback Request: new sectionNext edit →
Line 125: Line 125:
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | This is to thank you for guiding me through the Deletion Review process for the article about Andrew Tomas. I really appreciated your patience after I'd approached things the wrong way, and I'm glad of your guidance. The Deletion Review process has now confirmed the deletion, but at least I learned something from it all. Thank you for your help. ] (]) 22:34, 19 January 2014 (UTC) |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | This is to thank you for guiding me through the Deletion Review process for the article about Andrew Tomas. I really appreciated your patience after I'd approached things the wrong way, and I'm glad of your guidance. The Deletion Review process has now confirmed the deletion, but at least I learned something from it all. Thank you for your help. ] (]) 22:34, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
|} |}

== Rollback Request ==

Hello, I've been an editor for 6+ years, and over those years have sometimes been frustrated by having recreate pages due to multiple "vandalism" edits. I'd like to be able to "Rollback" edits when this occurs, as doing it by hand can involve opening multiple pages and editing windows when the "suspect edits" are numerous.

Though my edit counts for a person who has been editing as long as I have are not numerous, they are focused on the articles I care about, and wish maintain.

Please look over my body of work, and if you see fit to grant me "Rollback Status," I would appreciate it. If not, a note to let me know why, would also be appreciated.

Thank You, ] (]) 06:28, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:28, 20 January 2014

User:Chetblong/bar

This is Coffee's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.
Misplaced Pages, the 💕!
This user is more awesome than you.
This user is more awesome than you.

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

I like your user page setup. Can you help me?

Dear Coffee, I like the way your user page is set up. As I can see, it is actually tables. However, I do not know the wiki code/source code you used. Here are my User Links: User:Musicarts96/UserPage User_talk:Musicarts96 User:Musicarts96/User_Boxes

Can you help me? (some people just put idiot under this comment! (an unregistered IP address) From, Musicarts96 (talk) 18:27, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

If you look at the source editing of User:Coffee/Main and User:Coffee/bar you should be able to see how it's working. If you need any further assistance let me know. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 21:24, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Deletion review for Andrew Tomas

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Andrew Tomas. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

Thanks for your kind help with this. RomanSpa (talk) 21:15, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Roger that, thanks for the heads up. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 21:25, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

The Bronze

Your recent close of this AFD emphasised the lack of multiple sources. I didn't have time for the topic over Christmas but expect to be able to expand this without difficulty. Please could you userfy it for me. My plan is to work up the topic to DYK standard so that it will be reviewed when it is relaunched. Andrew (talk) 09:50, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

  • As explained at Misplaced Pages:Copying_within_Wikipedia#Userfication, "If an article is "userified"—copied or moved into user space—it must be fully attributed. If an article is being moved to userspace to avoid deletion (or to work on after deletion), the full history should be visible (restored if necessary) and then moved using the move button." What seems to have been done in this case is cut and paste userfication. This is not normal in my experience and would require detailed attribution on the talk page. The simplest way forward would be to revert that version and then do the userfication as an undelete and move. Sorry if this is a hassle but perhaps there's a standard userfy function in an admin toolkit which makes this easier. Andrew (talk) 13:57, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
  • In this case my intentions are to hold to the close on the AFD... the userfication was only done to allow you to make an article that is possibly up to our standards. If you are able to do this, you will then have to put in a request at DRV. If DRV allows the article to be placed back (possibly through a relisted AFD) at that time I will undelete the original article, and then you may copy-paste your new article on top. Unless you have a particular concern with having each of your edits attributed, instead of the mass, this should work fine. If you do want each of your edits attributed for some reason, then I'll have to re-close the AFD as "userfy" then undelete/move. Sadly there isn't any easy userfy function in our toolkit, or in a script function. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 14:55, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Deleted content (not a deletion review)

Hey there, I wanted to ask you about a page you recently deleted, Monster Madness (series). The page featured a long list of episodes from a web series created by James Rolfe, a notable independent filmmaker who also did the Angry Video Game Nerd. I wonder if it would be possible to restore the list of episodes in the page List of The Angry Video Game Nerd episodes, in a possible new section mentioning miscellaneous work by Rolfe, as in here: List of Nostalgia Critic episodes#Disneycember. Thanks. I'm not there. Message me! 18:43, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

User:Katastasi: Would you like if I emailed the page contents to you? — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 21:23, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Sure, if it doesn't bother you, thanks! My email is this: pedro.garcez@colegiodante.com.br I'm not there. Message me! 22:37, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
User:Katastasi:  Done You should have it in your inbox now. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 23:03, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Sydney Uni Lions

Coffee,

As you suggested, would you please userfy the article "Sydney Uni Lions" under my username - Wikidoubter. We are still getting together further references for the article. Also, it is not clear to me that the consensus of the discussion was to delete. After the changes were made to the article, the only people who reviewed the article were either keep or userfy. Anyway, please userfy the article and we will try to move forward from there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikidoubter (talk • contribs) 14:56, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Coffee. You have new messages at Klougas's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Problematic user

This user here keeps reverting changes without discussing, engages in personal attacks constantly (has been warned repeatedly on his talk page) and even removed comments from his own talk page. Can something be done about this disruptive editor? Mythic Writerlord (talk) 19:58, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

I have been watching this editor and agree he has been editing disruptively. I have issued a final warning. Coffee, feel free to act as you see fit, of course. Zad68 20:29, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

But there is no consensus for the Incel redirect page (in fact, it is recommended to include both terms) and the editor has not made a warning that Involuntary celibacy part of the Celibacy article doesn't include a part about fleshlights. MalleusMaleficarum1486 (talk) 20:34, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

A brownie for you! (Because brownies are good with coffee...)

This is to thank you for guiding me through the Deletion Review process for the article about Andrew Tomas. I really appreciated your patience after I'd approached things the wrong way, and I'm glad of your guidance. The Deletion Review process has now confirmed the deletion, but at least I learned something from it all. Thank you for your help. RomanSpa (talk) 22:34, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Rollback Request

Hello, I've been an editor for 6+ years, and over those years have sometimes been frustrated by having recreate pages due to multiple "vandalism" edits. I'd like to be able to "Rollback" edits when this occurs, as doing it by hand can involve opening multiple pages and editing windows when the "suspect edits" are numerous.

Though my edit counts for a person who has been editing as long as I have are not numerous, they are focused on the articles I care about, and wish maintain.

Please look over my body of work, and if you see fit to grant me "Rollback Status," I would appreciate it. If not, a note to let me know why, would also be appreciated.

Thank You, Mikepellerin (talk) 06:28, 20 January 2014 (UTC)