| Revision as of 22:07, 18 June 2006 editNat Krause (talk | contribs)15,397 edits reversions of Buddhism← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:29, 21 June 2006 edit undoNat Krause (talk | contribs)15,397 edits another 3RR warningNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| :I notice that you reverted ] again just now. It looks like you've reverted that page 5 times in the last 26 hours or so. This is definitely against the rules, so you must stop doing it.—]<sup>(])</sup> 22:07, 18 June 2006 (UTC) | :I notice that you reverted ] again just now. It looks like you've reverted that page 5 times in the last 26 hours or so. This is definitely against the rules, so you must stop doing it.—]<sup>(])</sup> 22:07, 18 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::It looks like you have again reverted a page, in this case ], four times in the course of a day. You really ''must'' play fair if you are going to edit Misplaced Pages. If you do this again, I'll have to notify the appropriate administrators.—]<sup>(])</sup> 00:29, 21 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:29, 21 June 2006
Hi there. I appreciate your contribution to Atman (Buddhism), but I would suggest that you use the discussion page there before placing what is a rather Pali-biased section of text in the introduction. The contribution you make is valued - but I am unsure about what your specific message is, and moreover, I am unsure that it represents all Buddhists. It's good to see a new wp editor (20040302 10:02, 18 December 2005 (UTC))
Discuss
I believe you have many contributions to make. You really should discuss your editorial at Talk:Atman (Buddhism) - your recent edits are already present in the main article - but I am becoming increasingly unsure about your willingness to cooperate, which is a necessary requirement for Misplaced Pages. (20040302 18:11, 18 December 2005 (UTC))
Repeated reversions
I noticed that you have reverted the page Ananda Coomaraswamy four times today. Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.—Nat Krause 04:21, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Reversions of Buddhism
I noticed that you have again reverted an article, in this case Buddhism, more than three times during one day (although just barely). Please refrain from doing this in the future. If you continue to do so, you might be blocked under the three revert rule.—Nat Krause 21:09, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- I notice that you reverted Buddhism again just now. It looks like you've reverted that page 5 times in the last 26 hours or so. This is definitely against the rules, so you must stop doing it.—Nat Krause 22:07, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- It looks like you have again reverted a page, in this case Ananda Coomaraswamy, four times in the course of a day. You really must play fair if you are going to edit Misplaced Pages. If you do this again, I'll have to notify the appropriate administrators.—Nat Krause 00:29, 21 June 2006 (UTC)