Revision as of 00:42, 27 March 2014 editIRISZOOM (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,892 editsm Fmt.← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:06, 12 April 2014 edit undoStalwart111 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers16,939 edits →Adding sources: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
: It doesn't matter if New York Times calls it a "kidnapping" because it is still not acceptable to call it that here at Misplaced Pages. The article ] is not perfect but in the lead, it's stated that he is a former MIA soldier, that he was abducted and captured. This is consistent with ]. --] (]) 00:42, 27 March 2014 (UTC) | : It doesn't matter if New York Times calls it a "kidnapping" because it is still not acceptable to call it that here at Misplaced Pages. The article ] is not perfect but in the lead, it's stated that he is a former MIA soldier, that he was abducted and captured. This is consistent with ]. --] (]) 00:42, 27 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
== Adding sources == | |||
You need to be careful about the material you add and the sources you base your additions on. You've recently added information to a series of articles based on URL-only sources linked to (very) recently published theories and claims. That one paper suggests something does not mean that we can use the source to completely change the premise of whole sections of articles. There's a reason that we require ideas to have been covered in ''multiple'' reliable sources. Adding article-changing content on the basis of one badly-cited source is never a good idea. Have a look at ] if you need more details. | |||
You also need to be careful about adding ]. Just because you have experienced something does not make it suitable for inclusion. Cheers, ]] 00:06, 12 April 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:06, 12 April 2014
old stuff
September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to M2 Browning may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- force during a training exercise with the 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit in November 2002. ]]]]
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:32, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Invitation to join MILHIST
Hello, BernardZ, you are hereby invited to join the Military history WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of topics related to military history, theory, and practice. You can add your name to the list of members, browse our showcase, train at the Academy, weigh in at current discussions, read the news, or find an open task. We hope you will join us! Anotherclown (talk) 19:51, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to MILHIST
Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
- The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
- Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
- The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
- We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
- We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
- If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Anotherclown (talk) 10:55, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Religion in Carthage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patricia Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Citing references
Hi - when you add references, an url isn't sufficient. You can read WP:CITE but if your setup is like mine, above this edit window where I'm typing is first a menu that has a large B, and italic I, etc and at the end has a dropdown menu 'Cite'. When you drop that down, and the next line there is a dropdown menu for templates which you can use. For books you need title, author, publisher, year published, ISBN and vitally page numbers. You always need titles, dates where relevant, authors when available, journal title if it's a journal (and the page numbers of the article, you don't normally need individual page numbers as you do for books). Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 09:18, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Please read the article in question
It says "A number of lifestyle factors are known to be important to the development of type 2 diabetes, including obesity (defined by a body mass index of greater than thirty), lack of physical activity, poor diet, stress, and urbanization. Excess body fat is associated with 30% of cases in those of Chinese and Japanese descent, 60-80% of cases in those of European and African descent, and 100% of cases in Pima Indians and Pacific Islanders. Those who are not obese often have a high waist–hip ratio." Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 16:57, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
MH370
Hi, a request that we keep all speculation and politically motivated statements out unless consensus is there to include them. Please bring it to the talk page. Thank you. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:38, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
1RR at List of Israeli assassinations
That article is subject to a one revert rule WP:1RR per this ArbCom decision. You've violated it and you should revert yourself soonest.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 00:08, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Here's the official warning:
As a result of an arbitration case, broad editing restrictions apply to all pages broadly related the Arab-Israeli conflict. These sanctions are described at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision and a brief summary is included below:
- Any uninvolved administrator may, at their own discretion, impose sanctions on editors working in the area of conflict who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process.
- Possible sanctions include blocks, bans and other editing restrictions.
- A one revert per twenty-four hours restriction applies to articles broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, editors may be blocked without warning if they breach this restriction. See here for more information.
— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 00:13, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- As Alf.laylah.wa.laylah says, you violated 1RR.
- It doesn't matter if New York Times calls it a "kidnapping" because it is still not acceptable to call it that here at Misplaced Pages. The article Gilad Shalit is not perfect but in the lead, it's stated that he is a former MIA soldier, that he was abducted and captured. This is consistent with WP:NPOV. --IRISZOOM (talk) 00:42, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Adding sources
You need to be careful about the material you add and the sources you base your additions on. You've recently added information to a series of articles based on URL-only sources linked to (very) recently published theories and claims. That one paper suggests something does not mean that we can use the source to completely change the premise of whole sections of articles. There's a reason that we require ideas to have been covered in multiple reliable sources. Adding article-changing content on the basis of one badly-cited source is never a good idea. Have a look at WP:WEIGHT if you need more details.
You also need to be careful about adding original research. Just because you have experienced something does not make it suitable for inclusion. Cheers, Stalwart111 00:06, 12 April 2014 (UTC)