Revision as of 19:53, 7 April 2014 editDetroit Joseph (talk | contribs)107 edits →Comments by other users← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:00, 8 April 2014 edit undoKing of Hearts (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators68,838 edits Requesting additional informationNext edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{SPIpriorcases}} | {{SPIpriorcases}} | ||
=====<big>05 April 2014</big>===== | =====<big>05 April 2014</big>===== | ||
{{SPI case status| |
{{SPI case status|moreinfo}} | ||
;Suspected sockpuppets | ;Suspected sockpuppets | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ||
* Thse two are quacking extremely loudly, but in the meantime I have fully protected the article. ] (]) 23:40, 5 April 2014 (UTC) | * Thse two are quacking extremely loudly, but in the meantime I have fully protected the article. ] (]) 23:40, 5 April 2014 (UTC) | ||
*{{moreinfo}} - {{DiffsNeeded|cu=no}} ] ] ] ] ♠ 22:00, 8 April 2014 (UTC) ] ] ] ] ♠ 22:00, 8 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
Revision as of 22:00, 8 April 2014
Detroit Joseph
Detroit Joseph (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Detroit Joseph/Archive.
05 April 2014
– An administrator or SPI clerk requires more information to determine what action to take.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Truth to the Forefront (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Corruption Watchpitbull (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Detroit Joseph repeatedly attempted to insert negative material in Farshad Fotouhi, a BLP. His edits were rejected by consensus and BLP policy. He persisted in his efforts and was topic-banned by the community for his trouble.
So shortly after the topic ban is imposed, two brand-new accounts show up, each making a few legitimate edits before making a beeline to reinsert the exact same information. The account names are also obviously tendentious.
NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 17:41, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.User:Corruption Watchpitbull - only edit of substance was to Farshad Fotouhi, https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Corruption_Watchpitbull all other minor edits were simply to attain auto confirmed status so as to be able to make the single edit to Farshad Fotouhi life story - a total copy of the content the topic banned user https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Detroit_Joseph#Topic_ban - User:Detroit Joseph was previously adding Mosfetfaser (talk) 18:38, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- You must be feeling real proud of yourself right now. You caught the evil sockpuppeteer! He's worse than Hitler! But why stop at this? Why don't you call The Detroit News and tell them to fire Lauren Abdel-Razzaq, an obvious sockpuppet of Tom Henderson from Crain's Detroit Business? There are more newspaper articles in the pipeline (drop time will depend on how much FOIA games WSU plays) and they will also be written by Tom Henderson sockpuppets. Truth to the Forefront (talk) 02:42, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Wow, what a long backlog! Misplaced Pages does not have enough sockpuppet-hunters to deal with all the editors angry at their inability to revert published mainstream newspapers. It sure is going to take a long time to come to the predetermined conclusion.
But what I want to know is this: where were all these self-righteous idiots when John Seigenthaler was getting slandered with ZERO newspaper articles? "A new policy, 'biographies of living persons', was created on December 17, 2005; editorial restrictions, including reference requirements, were introduced." With Fotouhi, there are FOUR references with more in the way in the next few months. You see, 4 > 0. Truth to the Forefront (talk) 13:06, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- Don't forget that some admins can change edit timestamps. It's not easy, but it can be done. This won't present any problem with Truth To The Forefront, but they will have to adjust some of Corruption Watchpitbull's edit timestamps. (But they might also decide that one sockpuppet is just as bad as two and it's not worth the trouble). So that's why I won't be supporting my argument with diffs, they can change the timestamp and say it proves nothing at all. Whatever. Detroit Joseph (talk) 19:53, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Thse two are quacking extremely loudly, but in the meantime I have fully protected the article. Black Kite (talk) 23:40, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Additional information needed - Clerk declined. In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
- At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
- At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
- In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:00, 8 April 2014 (UTC) King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:00, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Categories: