| Revision as of 08:13, 20 April 2014 editMurry1975 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users21,042 edits Warning: Disruptive editing on Thomas Andrews (shipbuilder). (TW) | Revision as of 08:52, 20 April 2014 edit undoMurry1975 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users21,042 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's ]. | * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's ]. | ||
| Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through ]. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being ]. ''Also few points, please understand that the encyclopedia is written by many people, with guidelines and rules to help. ] deals specifically with Irish issues, and this is an Irish issue. And ], we use NEUTRAL view when writing. There is also ], ] and ], reading these will add to your enjoyment and understanding on here. ''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive3 --> ] (]) 08:13, 20 April 2014 (UTC) | Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through ]. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being ]. ''Also few points, please understand that the encyclopedia is written by many people, with guidelines and rules to help. ] deals specifically with Irish issues, and this is an Irish issue. And ], we use NEUTRAL view when writing. There is also ], ] and ], reading these will add to your enjoyment and understanding on here. ''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive3 --> ] (]) 08:13, 20 April 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 08:52, 20 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:52, 20 April 2014
April 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Thomas Andrews (shipbuilder). Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Also few points, please understand that the encyclopedia is written by many people, with guidelines and rules to help. WP:IMOS deals specifically with Irish issues, and this is an Irish issue. And WP:NPOV, we use NEUTRAL view when writing. There is also WP:EDITWARRING, WP:BRD and WP:NOTESSAY, reading these will add to your enjoyment and understanding on here. Murry1975 (talk) 08:13, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Murry1975 (talk) 08:52, 20 April 2014 (UTC)