| Revision as of 23:35, 21 April 2014 edit172.56.10.95 (talk) Cannot see any reason to not have categories. Andy is right on this and it is helpful. Reverting this is unhelpful, it is that simple. Please refrain from petty reverts and warring over personality conflicts.← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:50, 22 April 2014 edit undoKoavf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,174,994 edits Reverted to revision 605092986 by Koavf (talk): Rv. There's no reason to include every variation on a name in every category. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
Revision as of 03:50, 22 April 2014
Redirect to: