Revision as of 21:06, 14 May 2014 editAnne Delong (talk | contribs)Administrators83,789 edits →User:DVMt/sandbox: delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:20, 15 May 2014 edit undoNeuraxis (talk | contribs)2,086 edits →User:DVMt/sandbox: cNext edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
This sandbox contains MASS ] and ] violations. It has not been updated for over a year. The first sentence in the sandbox is the same ] previously added on November 21, 2011 using the WHO source. There is no reason to repeat past mistakes or keep unencyclopedic junk dormant in a sandbox. ] (]) 20:18, 14 May 2014 (UTC) | This sandbox contains MASS ] and ] violations. It has not been updated for over a year. The first sentence in the sandbox is the same ] previously added on November 21, 2011 using the WHO source. There is no reason to repeat past mistakes or keep unencyclopedic junk dormant in a sandbox. ] (]) 20:18, 14 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
*'''Delete''' - as a ]. Misplaced Pages already has a well developed article on this topic. —] (]) 21:06, 14 May 2014 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' - as a ]. Misplaced Pages already has a well developed article on this topic. —] (]) 21:06, 14 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
:Quack you're making the allegations, now time to prove them. Where is the OR? Where are the MEDRS violations? How is it junk? How does is it not unencyclopedic? Prove your case. ] (]) 16:20, 15 May 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:20, 15 May 2014
User:DVMt/sandbox
This sandbox contains MASS WP:OR and WP:MEDRS violations. It has not been updated for over a year. The first sentence in the sandbox is the same WP:COPYVIO previously added to the lede on November 21, 2011 using the WHO source. There is no reason to repeat past mistakes or keep unencyclopedic junk dormant in a sandbox. QuackGuru (talk) 20:18, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - as a WP:FAKEARTICLE. Misplaced Pages already has a well developed article on this topic. —Anne Delong (talk) 21:06, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
- Quack you're making the allegations, now time to prove them. Where is the OR? Where are the MEDRS violations? How is it junk? How does is it not unencyclopedic? Prove your case. DVMt (talk) 16:20, 15 May 2014 (UTC)