Revision as of 10:45, 16 June 2014 editSchroCat (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers113,347 edits →Review description: new section← Previous edit |
Revision as of 21:38, 3 July 2014 edit undoTheironminer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,842 edits Reception Issue: The PlanNext edit → |
Line 27: |
Line 27: |
|
::I agree with you both: it is '''probably''' from 007 in NY, but without a reliable secondary source it remains ]. - ] (]) 20:26, 28 May 2014 (UTC) |
|
::I agree with you both: it is '''probably''' from 007 in NY, but without a reliable secondary source it remains ]. - ] (]) 20:26, 28 May 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Review description == |
|
== Reception issue == |
|
|
|
|
|
Theironminer, Could you please stop edit warring and discuss your proposed changes. Your suggested text goes against a long-standing consensus and you need to stop editing and explain WHY you think the change is a positive one. I have left you notification that one more reversion will breach ], and I strongly advise you to read that policy before you edit that phrase again. - ] (]) 10:45, 16 June 2014 (UTC) |
|
Theironminer, Could you please stop edit warring and discuss your proposed changes. Your suggested text goes against a long-standing consensus and you need to stop editing and explain WHY you think the change is a positive one. I have left you notification that one more reversion will breach ], and I strongly advise you to read that policy before you edit that phrase again. - ] (]) 10:45, 16 June 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
I see you are still obsessed with thr article. But I've found this talk page and I'm about to fix this. The only way we can see if the film DID recieve mixed reviews is to look on the internet for reviews from 2008 and see if they go in mixed order as you claim. If this prediction of mixed reviews fails, then I will have to ask for your permission for an edit similar to the reception for ] and ] that will make the article make more sense and show the truth. While I'm looking, take a look at the reception for ] and see what I've been trying to explain earlier. - Theironminer (]) 5:37 PM, 3 July, 2014 |
Theironminer, Could you please stop edit warring and discuss your proposed changes. Your suggested text goes against a long-standing consensus and you need to stop editing and explain WHY you think the change is a positive one. I have left you notification that one more reversion will breach WP:3RR, and I strongly advise you to read that policy before you edit that phrase again. - SchroCat (talk) 10:45, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
I see you are still obsessed with thr article. But I've found this talk page and I'm about to fix this. The only way we can see if the film DID recieve mixed reviews is to look on the internet for reviews from 2008 and see if they go in mixed order as you claim. If this prediction of mixed reviews fails, then I will have to ask for your permission for an edit similar to the reception for Elysium (film) and Traitor (film) that will make the article make more sense and show the truth. While I'm looking, take a look at the reception for Date Night and see what I've been trying to explain earlier. - Theironminer (talk) 5:37 PM, 3 July, 2014