| Revision as of 03:14, 18 June 2014 edit187.17.52.174 (talk) Undid revision 613373945 by Timeshift9 (talk) kindly fuck off, you're not interested in anything except being a dick← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:43, 18 June 2014 edit undoSkyring (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,595 edits →3RR discussion opened: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| ::::::Was that not the premise of your previous comment? ] (]) 02:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC) | ::::::Was that not the premise of your previous comment? ] (]) 02:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :::::::No. ] (]) 02:53, 18 June 2014 (UTC) | :::::::No. ] (]) 02:53, 18 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == 3RR discussion opened == | |||
| ==Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion== | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. | |||
Revision as of 03:43, 18 June 2014
Keating
See WP:BRD. Your change is disputed so it is now incumbent upon you to get a consensus on the article's talk page. Timeshift (talk) 02:15, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- I think you have mistaken an essay for a policy. It's first of all incumbent on you to explain why you dispute the edit. You do not have the right to simply revert edits because you don't like them. 187.17.52.174 (talk) 02:18, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Perhaps you'd like to utilize the talkpage? Or not. Timeshift (talk) 02:31, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Sure. But if you are the kind of person who thinks "disagree" is an adequate edit summary for a revert then it seems unlikely that you'll be much use in a discussion. 187.17.52.174 (talk) 02:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Since when is a talkpage discussion about just two editors? Timeshift (talk) 02:38, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Who said it was? 187.17.52.174 (talk) 02:41, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Was that not the premise of your previous comment? Timeshift (talk) 02:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Who said it was? 187.17.52.174 (talk) 02:41, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Since when is a talkpage discussion about just two editors? Timeshift (talk) 02:38, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Sure. But if you are the kind of person who thinks "disagree" is an adequate edit summary for a revert then it seems unlikely that you'll be much use in a discussion. 187.17.52.174 (talk) 02:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Perhaps you'd like to utilize the talkpage? Or not. Timeshift (talk) 02:31, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
3RR discussion opened
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you.