| Revision as of 05:01, 1 July 2014 view sourceEvergreenFir (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators129,519 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Bob's Burgers. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:02, 1 July 2014 view source ChrisP2K5 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,352 edits →July 2014Next edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] ] <small>Please {{]}}</small> 05:01, 1 July 2014 (UTC) | To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] ] <small>Please {{]}}</small> 05:01, 1 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
| Reverting edits adding false and misleading information to articles is not vandalism. --] (]) 05:02, 1 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:02, 1 July 2014
Bob's Burgers
Please stop removing sourced info from Bob's Burgers without consensus or discussion. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 03:37, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
- There's no consensus that needs to be reached; the creator of the show stated that it is not set in any particular place, and that's all there is to it. --ChrisP2K5 (talk) 04:48, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, as you did at Bob's Burgers, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. you apparently have a history of this EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 05:00, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Bob's Burgers shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 05:01, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Reverting edits adding false and misleading information to articles is not vandalism. --ChrisP2K5 (talk) 05:02, 1 July 2014 (UTC)