| Revision as of 15:36, 11 July 2014 editInfantom (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,198 edits →Blocked for sockpuppetry← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:49, 12 July 2014 edit undoDaniel Case (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators225,204 edits →Blocked for sockpuppetry: decline unblockNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| {{unblock reviewed | 1=This is a false accusation, i have no relation to the user you mentioned whatsoever. You are completely wrong! The "mutual" edits are merely coincidence. Is anything can be done in order to prove that this is a wrongful decision? ] (]) 14:25, 11 July 2014 (UTC) | decline = Given the evidence presented , you'll need a more convincing explanation than that. <b>] ]</b> 14:35, 11 July 2014 (UTC)}} | {{unblock reviewed | 1=This is a false accusation, i have no relation to the user you mentioned whatsoever. You are completely wrong! The "mutual" edits are merely coincidence. Is anything can be done in order to prove that this is a wrongful decision? ] (]) 14:25, 11 July 2014 (UTC) | decline = Given the evidence presented , you'll need a more convincing explanation than that. <b>] ]</b> 14:35, 11 July 2014 (UTC)}} | ||
| {{unblock reviewed | 1=About the "arguments": This edit] was made after this conversation, when the user i discussed with mentioned Yemenite Jews to support his claim, then i edited the article to be more accurate (the edit hasn't been changed BTW). Modern Hebrew was brought to my attention after this debate, when the user said a wrong claim about a debate over the classification of the language. As for the Germans article, just a coincidence. Notice that it is not even accurate since in my opinion Marx was an ethnic Jew while @Guy355 suggested he wasn't. ] (]) 15:36, 11 July 2014 (UTC) | decline = Coincidentally, your sock whose unblock I just declined also uses "just a coincidence" to excuse himself. Really, you've got to stop scraping out the floor of the barn and putting it on the Internet ... — ] (]) 02:49, 12 July 2014 (UTC)}} | |||
| {{unblock | reason=About the "arguments": | |||
| This edit] was made after this conversation, when the user i discussed with mentioned Yemenite Jews to support his claim, then i edited the article to be more accurate (the edit hasn't been changed BTW). | |||
| Modern Hebrew was brought to my attention after this debate, when the user said a wrong claim about a debate over the classification of the language. | |||
| As for the Germans article, just a coincidence. Notice that it is not even accurate since in my opinion Marx was an ethnic Jew while @Guy355 suggested he wasn't. | |||
| ] (]) 15:36, 11 July 2014 (UTC)}} | |||
Revision as of 02:49, 12 July 2014
Talkback
Message added 15:12, 10 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Changes on Israeli of Moroccan descent
Hello, thanks for your help, but Moroccan Jews is an ethnic group of Jews who live or who recents ancestors lived in Morocco, it's the actual definition of Moroccan Jews. Miri Bohadana and Ori Shitrit are both born from Moroccan parents, so they are Moroccan Jews, regardless their Israeli citizenship. Please do not remove my change. Kind regards
- السلام عليكم. First, thank you for your good faith and contribution, but unfortunately your are making a huge mistake. "...or who recents ancestors lived in Morocco..", that's not the correct definition, that's YOUR definition. You lack an understanding of basic terms. Please read the following articles: Jews, ethnic group and ethnoreligious group. Moroccan Jews is not an ethnic group, Jews ARE the ethnic group. Moreover, Israelis "of Moroccan origin" don't fit the definition of "Moroccans".
- I have noticed you have already encountered objections from other users, and yet you proceed with this mistake instead of discussing it. Please do not continue with this, or i'll have to report you. Thank you and best regards.
June 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Night of the Bridges, you may be blocked from editing. Uishaki (talk) 14:49, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Huh. Yes I know this very good but you can't understand that Misplaced Pages is a 💕 aiming to show the truth for everyone. I gave a source from the Palestinian Information Center but you're still not convinced that the destruction of bridges connecting Palestine with it's neighbors is considered terrorism. And that the Battles of Beersheba in 1917 amd Buqqar Ridge occured in Palestine not "southern Syria". I think that you should consider this a Final warning and stop your disruptive editing before you are being blocked indefinitely.--Uishaki (talk) 15:09, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- well, your sources are unreliable. Your are very biased and anti-Israel. Good to see you reverted your propaganda , as i said it is only a matter of time... Infantom (talk) 15:21, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- And how do you know that they are unreliable????????????????????? A 3 year old child can notice that you are anti Palestinian and biased for the corrupt Zionist entity. I swear that i will never let you have fun on Misplaced Pages so you can add deceptive info for the world. We learn from you Real PROPAGANDA!!!!--Uishaki (talk) 15:30, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- إن شاء الله!!!!!!!! --Infantom (talk) 15:46, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- And how do you know that they are unreliable????????????????????? A 3 year old child can notice that you are anti Palestinian and biased for the corrupt Zionist entity. I swear that i will never let you have fun on Misplaced Pages so you can add deceptive info for the world. We learn from you Real PROPAGANDA!!!!--Uishaki (talk) 15:30, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Jewish insurgency in Palestine, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 18:55, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- No problem, i'll pay attention next time. Thanks — Infantom (talk) 14:19, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
 | This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Infantom. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:20, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
|
Infantom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is a false accusation, i have no relation to the user you mentioned whatsoever. You are completely wrong! The "mutual" edits are merely coincidence. Is anything can be done in order to prove that this is a wrongful decision? Infantom (talk) 14:25, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Given the evidence presented here, you'll need a more convincing explanation than that. OhNoitsJamie 14:35, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Infantom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
About the "arguments": This edit] was made after this conversation, when the user i discussed with mentioned Yemenite Jews to support his claim, then i edited the article to be more accurate (the edit hasn't been changed BTW). Modern Hebrew was brought to my attention after this debate, when the user said a wrong claim about a debate over the classification of the language. As for the Germans article, just a coincidence. Notice that it is not even accurate since in my opinion Marx was an ethnic Jew while @Guy355 suggested he wasn't. Infantom (talk) 15:36, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Coincidentally, your sock whose unblock I just declined also uses "just a coincidence" to excuse himself. Really, you've got to stop scraping out the floor of the barn and putting it on the Internet ... — Daniel Case (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.