Revision as of 00:39, 22 July 2014 editCombatThisss (talk | contribs)33 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:41, 22 July 2014 edit undoBarek (talk | contribs)83,022 edits →July 2014: replyNext edit → | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Note: I suggest you start a discussion on this. Continued disruption can result in your account being blocked. --- ] <small>(] • ])</small> - 00:37, 22 July 2014 (UTC) | Note: I suggest you start a discussion on this. Continued disruption can result in your account being blocked. --- ] <small>(] • ])</small> - 00:37, 22 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
::: ]; really, an the founder's article becomes a ] for their company and ... taking this to Admin school. Continued disruption can result in desysopping. ] (]) | ::: ]; really, an the founder's article becomes a ] for their company and ... taking this to Admin school. Continued disruption can result in desysopping. ] (]) | ||
:Create a draft for it then, and get consensus to support the new article. The Draft namespace exists to allow an incubation area for new articles. --- ] <small>(] • ])</small> - 00:41, 22 July 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:41, 22 July 2014
July 2014
Note: Melaleuca, Inc was turned into a redirect per a previous AfD, as consensus held that the company had no notability outside of the founder. Nothing in your recreation of the article counters that issue. If you wish to re-create an article, I suggest you start a discussion to establish if consensus has changed. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:31, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
- You cannot revert based on previous AFD unless the article is essentially the same READ POLICY User:Barek. CombatThisss (talk) 00:33, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
- The recreated article has the identical same issues. Different wording with the same issue does not invalidate established consensus. Granted, that consensus is somewhat dated, so feel free to start a discussion to determine if consensus has changed. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:36, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Note: I suggest you start a discussion on this. Continued disruption can result in your account being blocked. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:37, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
- User:Barek; really, an the founder's article becomes a WP:COATRACK for their company and ... taking this to Admin school. Continued disruption can result in desysopping. CombatThisss (talk)
- Create a draft for it then, and get consensus to support the new article. The Draft namespace exists to allow an incubation area for new articles. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:41, 22 July 2014 (UTC)