| Revision as of 21:42, 3 July 2006 editBabydaddy (talk | contribs)16 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:36, 3 July 2006 edit undoBarkeep49 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, New page reviewers, Oversighters, Administrators40,929 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| I should not have labeled it "kiddy porn" but the site is not relevant to FOFC and FN keeps pimping it on the wiki page, even though multiple users(other than myself) have deleted the link to it here. Sportsdigs hasn't had an original discussion post in days the last time I checked. | I should not have labeled it "kiddy porn" but the site is not relevant to FOFC and FN keeps pimping it on the wiki page, even though multiple users(other than myself) have deleted the link to it here. Sportsdigs hasn't had an original discussion post in days the last time I checked. | ||
| steve | steve | ||
| *Perhaps I've just been swayed by their propoganda and their actual utility to FOF is low, though they perhaps would deserve recognition on the more general text sim page as they do seem to cover the "news" of the genre. ] 22:36, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:36, 3 July 2006
I should not have labeled it "kiddy porn" but the site is not relevant to FOFC and FN keeps pimping it on the wiki page, even though multiple users(other than myself) have deleted the link to it here. Sportsdigs hasn't had an original discussion post in days the last time I checked.
steve
- Perhaps I've just been swayed by their propoganda and their actual utility to FOF is low, though they perhaps would deserve recognition on the more general text sim page as they do seem to cover the "news" of the genre. Barkeep49 22:36, 3 July 2006 (UTC)