| Revision as of 16:34, 30 July 2014 editDieSwartzPunkt (talk | contribs)3,096 edits →Original research: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:42, 30 July 2014 edit undoWtshymanski (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users76,122 edits old businessNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| "Not a parts catalog" essay from my response at . Hope you don't mind. ] (]) 08:52, 28 July 2014 (UTC) | "Not a parts catalog" essay from my response at . Hope you don't mind. ] (]) 08:52, 28 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
| : Then your argument is doomed; not one parts catalog entry has ever been deleted from Misplaced Pages in response to my efforts. We *like* catalog entries on Misplaced Pages, they are so easy to do and they look *just like encyclopedia articles* by our uncritical standards. --] (]) 18:05, 28 July 2014 (UTC) | : Then your argument is doomed; not one parts catalog entry has ever been deleted from Misplaced Pages in response to my efforts. We *like* catalog entries on Misplaced Pages, they are so easy to do and they look *just like encyclopedia articles* by our uncritical standards. --] (]) 18:05, 28 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == Original research == | |||
| Misplaced Pages does not permit ] as you introduced at ]. What anyone sees in any emporium is not acceptable citation for adding material to any article. Please provide appropriate citations should you chose to reintroduce this material. ] (]) 16:34, 30 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:42, 30 July 2014
This is a talk page
I have linked your ...
"Not a parts catalog" essay from my response at this AFD discussion. Hope you don't mind. Jeh (talk) 08:52, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
- Then your argument is doomed; not one parts catalog entry has ever been deleted from Misplaced Pages in response to my efforts. We *like* catalog entries on Misplaced Pages, they are so easy to do and they look *just like encyclopedia articles* by our uncritical standards. --Wtshymanski (talk) 18:05, 28 July 2014 (UTC)