Misplaced Pages

User:N-HH: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:04, 31 July 2014 editN-HH (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers10,142 edits Not worth the effort← Previous edit Revision as of 21:02, 31 July 2014 edit undoN-HH (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers10,142 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
The main reason Misplaced Pages is so unreliable and badly written as a source is not the drive-by vandalism but because around 50% of the regular content editors and the administrators are morons. If you think it's bad reading WP pages, try editing them. The main reason Misplaced Pages is so unreliable as a resource and badly written is not the drive-by vandalism but because around 50% of the regular content editors and the administrators are morons; many of them morons on a mission to tell the world about how great or terrible something or someone is. If you think it's painful reading WP pages, try editing them.

Revision as of 21:02, 31 July 2014

The main reason Misplaced Pages is so unreliable as a resource and badly written is not the drive-by vandalism but because around 50% of the regular content editors and the administrators are morons; many of them morons on a mission to tell the world about how great or terrible something or someone is. If you think it's painful reading WP pages, try editing them.