Misplaced Pages

User:N-HH: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:02, 31 July 2014 editN-HH (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers10,142 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 18:00, 28 February 2016 edit undoN-HH (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers10,142 edits Wasn't wrong before, but make less rude and perhaps clearerNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
The main reason Misplaced Pages is so unreliable as a resource and badly written is not the drive-by vandalism but because around 50% of the regular content editors and the administrators are morons; many of them morons on a mission to tell the world about how great or terrible something or someone is. If you think it's painful reading WP pages, try editing them. The main reason Misplaced Pages is so unreliable as a resource and badly written is not the drive-by vandalism or joke edits by IP editors but because so many of the regular account-holders and content editors are basically ignorant about the topics they contribute to and have no idea how to read and research topics or to construct readable, coherent, concise and genuinely impartial encyclopedic content.

This is meant to be an encyclopedia rather than a place to tell the world about either how great or how terrible you think a particular political ideology, artistic endeavour, individual or nation is. Too many people can't tell the difference and often seem to think that a page here can only be "neutral" if it happens to tally with the way that they see the world and will only be "properly sourced" when it relies on sources and commentary favourable to that worldview.

If you think it's painful reading WP pages, try editing them.

Revision as of 18:00, 28 February 2016

The main reason Misplaced Pages is so unreliable as a resource and badly written is not the drive-by vandalism or joke edits by IP editors but because so many of the regular account-holders and content editors are basically ignorant about the topics they contribute to and have no idea how to read and research topics or to construct readable, coherent, concise and genuinely impartial encyclopedic content.

This is meant to be an encyclopedia rather than a place to tell the world about either how great or how terrible you think a particular political ideology, artistic endeavour, individual or nation is. Too many people can't tell the difference and often seem to think that a page here can only be "neutral" if it happens to tally with the way that they see the world and will only be "properly sourced" when it relies on sources and commentary favourable to that worldview.

If you think it's painful reading WP pages, try editing them.