Misplaced Pages

User talk:JHUbal27: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:19, 13 August 2014 editGo Phightins! (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators21,768 edits What the crap are you doing?: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 04:36, 13 August 2014 edit undoMarchjuly (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users111,796 edits What the crap are you doing?: Added comment.Next edit →
Line 19: Line 19:


You were at one time a promising, up-and-coming editor whom I trusted enough to let work in my adoption program after having successfully completed it. What the heck happened? Knock it off; we want the old JHUbal back. '''] ]]''' 02:19, 13 August 2014 (UTC) You were at one time a promising, up-and-coming editor whom I trusted enough to let work in my adoption program after having successfully completed it. What the heck happened? Knock it off; we want the old JHUbal back. '''] ]]''' 02:19, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Despite the personal attack you left on my talk page, I second the sentiment expressed above by {{u|Go Phightins!}}. The edits you were making to "Frankie Grande" did not seem constructive at all in my opinion. This was previously pointed out ] and is primarily why you were blocked the first time. Then, you started doing something similar to not only "Frankie Grande", but also to another article. If you feel my undoing of your edits was incorrect, then the thing to do would have been to try and discuss it on the article's talk page; I am more than happy to admit my mistakes. Having an edit reverted can be frustrating, but it's not really a good reason to ] that you end up being ] to other editors. I truly hope that when this latest block is over, you will have a change of heart, come back to Misplaced Pages, and once again contribute constructively. I am pretty sure that any good faith attempts you make to improve "Frankie Grande" would be most welcomed by others. {{p|smile}} - ] (]) 04:36, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:36, 13 August 2014

User:JHUbal27 ~~JHUbal27 23:45, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Acknowledged vandalism

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with to Frankie Grande. Jack1956 (talk) 23:55, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Sorry to see you go

So I stumbled across your userpage via my watchlist, and I'm surprised to see such a productive editor like you leave like that, and after noticing what's going on at Frankie Grande, I'm surprised you decided to just retire altogether. I'm aware things do get tough and don't go your way, and you'd resort to any measure to help you, but you can't win all of them; the 1985 Bears had everything go great until Miami, but went on to win the Super Bowl in the end since they didn't give in. I'm confident you can bounce back from a disappointing incident like the edit war going on, so even if it ends as you wouldn't want it to, just move on and don't let it get you down. As Andy Grammer once sang, "'I start to compromise, my life and the purpose, is it all worth it, am I gonna turn out fine?' Fine, oh you'll turn out fine.... Fine, oh you'll turn out fine: But you gotta keep your head up oh-oh, and you can let your hair down eh-eh, I know it's hard, know it's hard, to remember sometimes, but you gotta keep your head up oh-oh, and you can let your hair down." I'd like to see you keep editing even in the midst of all this, but if it's for the best, I wish you the best of luck in the future. Zappa24Mati 00:18, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring at Frankie Grande

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The complete report of this case is at this 3RR report (permalink). A complaint was also filed at WP:ANI. EdJohnston (talk) 01:05, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Misplaced Pages, as you did at Theresa Caputo, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Andrew 06:32, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Misplaced Pages for a period of 72 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Daniel Case (talk) 06:53, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

What the crap are you doing?

You were at one time a promising, up-and-coming editor whom I trusted enough to let work in my adoption program after having successfully completed it. What the heck happened? Knock it off; we want the old JHUbal back. Go Phightins! 02:19, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Despite the personal attack you left on my talk page, I second the sentiment expressed above by Go Phightins!. The edits you were making to "Frankie Grande" did not seem constructive at all in my opinion. This was previously pointed out here and is primarily why you were blocked the first time. Then, you started doing something similar to not only "Frankie Grande", but also to another article. If you feel my undoing of your edits was incorrect, then the thing to do would have been to try and discuss it on the article's talk page; I am more than happy to admit my mistakes. Having an edit reverted can be frustrating, but it's not really a good reason to get so upset that you end up being uncivil to other editors. I truly hope that when this latest block is over, you will have a change of heart, come back to Misplaced Pages, and once again contribute constructively. I am pretty sure that any good faith attempts you make to improve "Frankie Grande" would be most welcomed by others. - Marchjuly (talk) 04:36, 13 August 2014 (UTC)