| Revision as of 02:59, 5 September 2014 editPhilKnight (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators126,083 edits rephrase decline← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:02, 5 September 2014 edit undoOhnoitsjamie (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators261,339 edits enoughNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| {{unblock reviewed|Ah, so another administrator joins in the trolling. In fact, my request very clearly addressed both the reasons given for the block, but you have ignored the fact that the block was applied simply because I complained that someone had taken it upon themselves to undo 50 of my edits, for no reason at all. ] (]) 02:21, 5 September 2014 (UTC)| decline=From this it's perfectly obvious who you are. ] (]) 02:59, 5 September 2014 (UTC)}} | {{unblock reviewed|Ah, so another administrator joins in the trolling. In fact, my request very clearly addressed both the reasons given for the block, but you have ignored the fact that the block was applied simply because I complained that someone had taken it upon themselves to undo 50 of my edits, for no reason at all. ] (]) 02:21, 5 September 2014 (UTC)| decline=From this it's perfectly obvious who you are. ] (]) 02:59, 5 September 2014 (UTC)}} | ||
| {{unblock|More trolling! Wonderful. I'm glad it's obvious to you that I am the same user as that IP, but how exactly does that mean that I should have been blocked for complaining that someone was destroying a considerable amount of my work for no reason? Perhaps you can take this a little bit seriously and give an actual sensible comprehensive answer, instead of just spouting irrelevant nonsense.] (]) 02:58, 5 September 2014 (UTC)}} | |||
| ==Sockpuppet investigation== | ==Sockpuppet investigation== | ||
| Line 14: | Line 12: | ||
| |] | |] | ||
| }} ] (]) 17:05, 4 September 2014 (UTC) | }} ] (]) 17:05, 4 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :Looks like you don't understand what an account it. ] (]) 02:59, 5 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:02, 5 September 2014
You have been blocked from editing Misplaced Pages for a period of 2 weeks as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie 14:43, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
190.162.88.128 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I appear to have been blocked for complaining that someone was undoing all my work. Here is the complaint:. And here is the response: . In the text here it claims disruptive edits, while in the block log it claims block evasion. Neither of these are true. The block appears to be a petty attack by an administrator who has taken a dislike to me. 190.162.88.128 (talk) 14:49, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This request does not address the issue that resulted in your block. Tiderolls 16:00, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
190.162.88.128 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Ah, so another administrator joins in the trolling. In fact, my request very clearly addressed both the reasons given for the block, but you have ignored the fact that the block was applied simply because I complained that someone had taken it upon themselves to undo 50 of my edits, for no reason at all. 190.162.88.128 (talk) 02:21, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
From this edit it's perfectly obvious who you are. PhilKnight (talk) 02:59, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sockpuppet investigation
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Misplaced Pages account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/190.44.133.67, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Misplaced Pages administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Misplaced Pages policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Misplaced Pages community.