Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 09:41, 6 October 2014

If I leave a message for you: Please respond on your talk page. I'll probably add it to my watchlist, but if I miss something, feel free to leave a talkback. If you leave a message for me: I will most likely respond here. Either add this page to your watchlist or ask me to notify you of a response on your talk page. Note: I reserve the right to decline or withdraw from a situation that is escalating or uncomfortable, without giving a reason, or to take further action through permissable means. (See this policy.) If I mistakenly called your edits as vandalism when I reverted them, it was probably because you did not leave an edit summary. Please realize that, in many cases, unexplained edits are indistinguishable from vandalism! This also applies to Rollbacks. If you're here to troll, harass, or vandalise, I might not be able to stop you, but you will be reverted...and beware the giant dice.

This editor is an Auspicious Looshpah and is entitled to display this Book of All Knowledge with Secret Appendix.

Archives

as Aerobird - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25

This page has archives. Sections older than 24 hours may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present.

User:Nomian/Bangladesh–Slovakia relations

Hello, can you please have a look at the draft? It was recently deleted via an AfD and I have significantly expanded it since then. I believe it meets the general notability guidelines but the closing admin told me to have it checked by an admin before moving to the mainspace. Regards Nomian (talk) 17:19, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Looks good to me. Informative too. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 17:29, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, then Should I move it to the mainspace? Nomian (talk) 17:53, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

It looks alright to me, although I would caution that there are those who simply believe this topic as a whole is unnotable, so look out for them. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 19:59, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, I think I will have better argument this time if they put it up for deletion again. Nomian (talk) 20:45, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Dear Bushranger, the closing admin again deleted it stating that I need an explicit approval. Do you have any objection if it is moved to the mainspace? Nomian (talk) 14:10, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Apologies, Bushranger. Nomian had posted on my talk page (as closing admin) and I was unaware of them posting here, too. Do you think this is sufficiently different from the version deleted after AfD? The added reference is very much like those criticized during the AfD. --Randykitty (talk) 16:02, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

IMHO, it should be good enough, however my position on this sort of article is pretty much the exact opposite of those criticising, so the appropriate grains of salt may be necessary. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:34, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Restore logo

BR, could you please restore File:EADS2010.png? It's to be used in the restored EADS article Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 22:16, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

 Done - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:00, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll update the Fair use if the EADS article is deleted again. - BilCat (talk) 00:09, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Closing Community Sanctions re - Krzyhorse22

Hi - I think the community sanctions request re Krzyhorse22 is closeable with consensus only for him to stop templating StanTheMan87's talk page and claiming he's consulting with the CIA (there doesn't appear to be consensus for a total IBAN). Would it be possible you could close it as such? I've just had an ANI opened against myself today so I think it would look bad if I was closing ANIs while I'm, simultaneously, being investigated. Best - DocumentError (talk) 01:14, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Ah, sorry I missed this - been busy lately. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:30, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

policy questions

I was looking at the AfD discussion at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of Australian heavyweight boxing champions and saw several keep arguments that seem like a misinterpretation to me--WP:IMPERFECT and WP:NOEFFORT. I thought I understood when those are applicable, but they're being used as reasons to keep the aforementioned article--which is one I would have thought of as an obvious delete. I'm hoping you can explain what I'm missing in this discussion. Thanks. Papaursa (talk) 20:14, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

I'll take a look, thanks. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:31, 5 October 2014 (UTC)