| Revision as of 15:11, 10 July 2006 editChuck Marean (talk | contribs)3,882 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:14, 10 July 2006 edit undoZimZalaBim (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers47,641 editsm Reverted edits by Chuck Marean (talk) to last version by CrzrussianNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| Welcome. If you're leaving a "direction", explain why the idea itself is good, and be polite. Remember whoever you are, I don't know if you know what you're talking about. | Welcome. If you're leaving a "direction", explain why the idea itself is good, and be polite. Remember whoever you are, I don't know if you know what you're talking about. | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| == Deleting talk page == | |||
| Chuck, as has been pointed out to you before , deleting warnings and relevant discussions from your talk page without archiving is ]. Having access to previous discussions benefits yourself as well as other editors, especially when the discussions are good faith efforts to help you better understand policy and make contributions to our encyclopedia. Here are links to three large chunks of your talk page that you have removed: , , . If you like, I can help you with ]. --] (]) 11:36, 10 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Chuck, it is too bad that you think that my comments were threatening. I was following convention regarding users blanking warnings on your own user page by ('''<nowiki>{{</nowiki>Wr<nowiki>}}</nowiki>''') on your user page and restoring the warnings. I am happy to defer to mtz206's decision regarding the restoration of the warnings. Regardless, the warnings were put there to inform you of the need to cooperate with the community, as it has attempted to cooperate with you. --] 13:57, 10 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==24 hr block== | |||
| For Legal threats and removing warnings from your user talk page. | |||
| {{blocked}} - <b>]</b><small> ]/]</small> 14:58, 10 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:14, 10 July 2006
 | This user lives in the United States of America. |
Welcome. If you're leaving a "direction", explain why the idea itself is good, and be polite. Remember whoever you are, I don't know if you know what you're talking about.
Deleting talk page
Chuck, as has been pointed out to you before , deleting warnings and relevant discussions from your talk page without archiving is generally frowned upon. Having access to previous discussions benefits yourself as well as other editors, especially when the discussions are good faith efforts to help you better understand policy and make contributions to our encyclopedia. Here are links to three large chunks of your talk page that you have removed: , , . If you like, I can help you with making a proper archive. --mtz206 (talk) 11:36, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Chuck, it is too bad that you think that my comments were threatening. I was following convention regarding users blanking warnings on your own user page by placing a very innocuous template ({{Wr}}) on your user page and restoring the warnings. I am happy to defer to mtz206's decision regarding the restoration of the warnings. Regardless, the warnings were put there to inform you of the need to cooperate with the community, as it has attempted to cooperate with you. --Avogadro 13:57, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
24 hr block
For Legal threats and removing warnings from your user talk page.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.