| Revision as of 03:04, 2 November 2014 editDreadstar (talk | contribs)53,180 edits Gamergate GS notification|sig← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:07, 2 November 2014 edit undoDreadstar (talk | contribs)53,180 edits edit warring noticeNext edit → | ||
| Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
| | Commons-emblem-notice.svg | | Commons-emblem-notice.svg | ||
| | icon size = 50px}} | | icon size = 50px}} | ||
| ==Edit war== | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] <small>]</small> 03:07, 2 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:07, 2 November 2014
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
| Thank you for your service to excellence for your work with one of my very favorite bands Radiohead. Keep up the stellar work! Aces! Kingslove2013 (talk) 11:39, 14 August 2014 (UTC) |
Thanks
Thanks for reverting my edit. I know this sounds like sarcasm, but that made me finally realize that plots in articles don't need to describe stuff in too much detail. That helps me a lot because I always wondered about this. By the way, the boss part was just sarcasm, in case you didn't know (you probaly do). URDNEXT (talk) 16:43, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
- Glad you agree! I think a lot of inexperienced editors feel an urge to explain things in huge detail, especially if it's something they're passionate about (I've made this mistake in the past too). Copy editing is a fine art, and tough to master - I do it for a living, so I've had a lot of practice. Sometimes I go too far and other editors have to rein me in.
- You might find Misplaced Pages:How_to_write_a_plot_summary and especially Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Film/Style_guidelines/Copy-editing_essentials#Don.27t_lose_the_plot useful. Popcornduff (talk) 17:30, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks again man! By the way, are you available for doing the plot of an article any time in the future? I started editing 1001 Spikes, but noticed it doesn't have a plot in the article. I don't think I can take on watching Let's Plays and write about it, so I was wondering if you could help me write the plot of the game in the article? The game is pretty short, and should be an easy job. Thanks for everything in advance, URDNEXT (talk) 17:45, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I don't think I can bring myself to research a game just to write a plot summary for it. I'm far too lazy for that. :) Popcornduff (talk) 17:47, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Hi Pop! Thanks for the Weezer pages you've done! As for a minor suggestion, the working cover art for Songs from the Black Hole is up on Weezerpedia. I've included the link. It's your call if you want to include it, but from my understanding it wasn't fan art but rather the real cover as they were tracking. Great page (Songs from the black hole) btw!
http://www.weezerpedia.com/index.php?title=Songs_from_the_Black_Hole Kingslove2013 (talk) 12:37, 15 August 2014 (UTC) |
Help
Hey, can you do a little copy editing on Batman: Under the Red Hood's plot section? I think it needs a revamp. URDNEXT (talk) 12:19, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry dude, but I'm uncomfortable editing plot summaries for games/movies/etc I haven't experienced. Popcornduff (talk) 12:24, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- Ok then. URDNEXT (talk) 12:39, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Copy editing
How's it going? Is there anyway you can copy edit Sleeping Dogs? I'm not that good at proses yet, and Tezero and Czar (the other nominators) don't have time to fix the issues raised by the reviewers at the FAC. Their concerns are all related to the prose, so it would be extremely appreciated if you could help me with it, even in some sections like gameplay and downloadable content Thank you. URDNEXT (talk) 00:09, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Oathkeeper
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Oathkeeper. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:The Zeitgeist Movement
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Zeitgeist Movement. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
FAC for xx (album)
Hi. Would you be interested in commenting at or reviewing my FAC for xx (album)? There hasn't been any activity there for 10 days, so any input would be appreciated. Dan56 (talk) 23:45, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:List of One Piece characters
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of One Piece characters. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Anita Sarkeesian
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Anita Sarkeesian. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Hi-5 (Australian band)
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Hi-5 (Australian band). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Control (Garbage song)
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Control (Garbage song). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
November 2014
Please read this notification carefully:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Gamergate controversy.
The details of these sanctions are described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. Dreadstar ☥ 03:04, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Edit war
Your recent editing history at Gamergate controversy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dreadstar ☥ 03:07, 2 November 2014 (UTC)