| Revision as of 10:48, 11 December 2014 edit331dot (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators183,329 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:58, 11 December 2014 edit undo331dot (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators183,329 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on T-90. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| Things would be much more helpful if you used the article's talk page to discuss any issues instead of doing so in edit summaries. Please do so. ] (]) 10:48, 11 December 2014 (UTC) | Things would be much more helpful if you used the article's talk page to discuss any issues instead of doing so in edit summaries. Please do so. ] (]) 10:48, 11 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 10:58, 11 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:58, 11 December 2014
December 2014
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Misplaced Pages, as you did at T-90. Using sock puppets is not acceptable; your IP has already been reported for edit warring. 331dot (talk) 10:44, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Things would be much more helpful if you used the article's talk page to discuss any issues instead of doing so in edit summaries. Please do so. 331dot (talk) 10:48, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at T-90 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 331dot (talk) 10:58, 11 December 2014 (UTC)