| Revision as of 01:39, 15 December 2014 editHBC AIV helperbot5 (talk | contribs)796,734 edits 1 IP & 2 users left. rm Crboyer2.0 (blocked indef by Salvidrim! (ACB)). 3 comment(s) removed.← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:47, 15 December 2014 edit undoSalvidrim! (talk | contribs)Edit filter helpers, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors28,654 edits →User-reported: reNext edit → | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| *{{IPvandal|107.15.41.141}} - IP repeating disruptive behavior --—] (]) 21:32, 14 December 2014 (UTC) | *{{IPvandal|107.15.41.141}} - IP repeating disruptive behavior --—] (]) 21:32, 14 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :* Confused "vandal" here. I believe the article in question is ]. My edits have been in support of the apparent consensus, to which the reporting editor is opposed. This appears to be an attempt to eliminate an "opponent" so they have one fewer editor to revert after a failed AfD nomination. See reversions: and (rebuffed) good faith attempt to avoid conflict: . --] (]) 22:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC) | :* Confused "vandal" here. I believe the article in question is ]. My edits have been in support of the apparent consensus, to which the reporting editor is opposed. This appears to be an attempt to eliminate an "opponent" so they have one fewer editor to revert after a failed AfD nomination. See reversions: and (rebuffed) good faith attempt to avoid conflict: . --] (]) 22:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ::*'''Not vandalism''' - Plenty of reasons I can think of to decling this AIV report: content dispute, not vandalism, not sufficiently warned, AIV not for complex cases, etc.; Ryulong you should probably know better than to toss this into AIV anyways. <span style="font-family:Sylfaen;color:white;background:black;padding:0 3px;">☺ · ] · ]</span> 01:47, 15 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| *{{vandal|Mcclian}} nonsense like this after several warnings.] (]) 22:27, 14 December 2014 (UTC) | *{{vandal|Mcclian}} nonsense like this after several warnings.] (]) 22:27, 14 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:47, 15 December 2014
"WP:RVAN" redirects here. For information on how to respond to vandalism, see Misplaced Pages:Vandalism § How to respond to vandalism.| Noticeboards | |
|---|---|
| Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
| General | |
| Articles, content | |
| Page handling | |
| User conduct | |
| Other | |
| Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards | |
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.
Important!- The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
- Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
- The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
- If you decide that a report should be filed, place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
* {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
- Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
- Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
- This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
This page was last updated at 17:20 on 13 January 2025 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Reports
Bot-reported
- 2600:1700:3d80:3e30:69fd:32b4:4f4b:f306 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 957 five times in the last 5 minutes (Removal of article lead, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:15, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Warned user. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:03, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2001:569:fa3f:c600:29c7:4d0c:2c3c:d58e (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:21, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
No vandalism since final warning. Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- MakKauHitam (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Indonesia national football team: actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Continous vandalism on every football related articles, adding image link which the file does not exist and nonsense football players from high ranking leagues. ~ Muffin Wizard 20:33, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- This looks more like newbie errors to me, rather than intentional vandalism. Can you specify edits that you think are vandalism? -- Ed (Edgar181) 21:21, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- 107.15.41.141 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - IP repeating disruptive behavior --—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 21:32, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Confused "vandal" here. I believe the article in question is Fredrick Brennan. My edits have been in support of the apparent consensus, to which the reporting editor is opposed. This appears to be an attempt to eliminate an "opponent" so they have one fewer editor to revert after a failed AfD nomination. See reversions: and (rebuffed) good faith attempt to avoid conflict: . --107.15.41.141 (talk) 22:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Not vandalism - Plenty of reasons I can think of to decling this AIV report: content dispute, not vandalism, not sufficiently warned, AIV not for complex cases, etc.; Ryulong you should probably know better than to toss this into AIV anyways. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 01:47, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- Mcclian (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) unsourced nonsense like this after several warnings.LM2000 (talk) 22:27, 14 December 2014 (UTC)