Misplaced Pages

Talk:Arba'in: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:25, 18 December 2014 editAnders Feder (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,552 editsm →Misplaced Pages policy← Previous edit Revision as of 13:40, 19 December 2014 edit undoMhhossein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers24,836 edits →Misplaced Pages policyNext edit →
Line 42: Line 42:
::* : The part is not neutral and unreliably sourced. ::* : The part is not neutral and unreliably sourced.
::--] (]) 01:24, 18 December 2014 (UTC) ::--] (]) 01:24, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Anders Feder}} So you are sure about yourself and doubtful about others?
:::'''1''': So what's the role of huffington post and alalam there? (Although it is not your edition! sorry for the mistake)
:::'''2''': What's the role of <ref name="Shaykh Saleem Bhimji">{{cite web|last1=Shaykh Saleem Bhimji|title=Arbaeen of Imam Husayn|url=http://www.al-islam.org/arbaeen-imam-husayn-shaykh-saleem-bhimji/arbaeen-imam-husayn|publisher=www.al-mubin.org}}</ref> there?
:::'''3''': Did you call Huffington post a Blog? Which blog do you mean exactly. Parts you removed are mainly from Huffington post!
:::'''4''': When some parts are not neutral it does not mean that you can delete it, at most you could help it becoming neutral by making copy editions and adding balancing sources. Again, you removed parts from huffington post.
::: By ] in editing the article I won't count them as ]. So please help in reaching the consensus. ] (]) 13:39, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:40, 19 December 2014

WikiProject iconIslam: Shi'a Islam Start‑class Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article is supported by the Shi'a Islam task force.
WikiProject iconIraq Start‑class Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Arba'in article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1
A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the On this day section on March 10, 2007, February 27, 2008, February 4, 2010, January 14, 2012, January 3, 2013, December 23, 2013, and December 13, 2014.

An early version of this article was based on translations of the entries for Arba'in in the fr: and de: Wikipedias. -- The Anome 21:42, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)

A great start

Just added my penny's worth. Apologies if this breaches protocol I'm not aware of. I'm a virginal poster!

Leo Africanus 14:14, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)

No, that's the whole idea -- we edit collaboratively, and no-one "owns" the article. Thanks for your contribution, which has significantly improved the article. (You can read Welcome, Newcomer for more information). -- The Anome 16:12, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)


Can someone please add references!!!

when is Arba'een in 2005 ?

When is Arba'een in 2005 in the Gregorian calendar ?

Number of pilgrims in 2013

Article says:

The number of pilgrims was expected to rise to 18 million during the next two days, Arbaeen reached over 18 million in 2013.

The problem is that none of references are realy neutral (NPOV) and an acceptable source of verification (VER). they are all dependent to shia news agencies. تیرداد (talk) 19:42, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages policy

Please try to adhere to Misplaced Pages policy when editing this article. Misplaced Pages is not a soapbox for promoting personal views or one's favorite branch of Islam. Only state facts backed up by reliable, verifiable sources, not merely opinions or excerpts from various blogs. I intend to remove content which I deem to be contrary to the aims and policies of Misplaced Pages. If you disagree with my edits, please state your reasons here so they can be discussed, rather than merely initiating a edit war.--Anders Feder (talk) 00:06, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Hey Anders Feder! Is there any valid reason for the following:
  • 1: You've removed some of the sourced materials without maintaining the reason.
  • 2: You've removed some of the sourced materials without maintaining the reason.
  • 3: Most of what you've removed are well sourced materials and are not from blog.
  • 4: I can't really figure out, why???
By the way I also can not understand why you've mentioned edit war. Does it mean that your editions will likely make other editors involve edit war? Mhhossein (talk) 16:03, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Yes, people on a crusade to promote their religion on Misplaced Pages unfortunately often indulge in edit warring because they are unable to have their propaganda included under regular standards of reliability and neutrality, as if being disruptive would somehow make them seem more convincing.
  • 1: The reason is obvious - the sources are not reliable.
  • 2: Same as above.
  • 3: The parts I've removed are not well-sourced, but cite the opinion blog of a "faith leader".
  • 4: The part is not neutral and unreliably sourced.
--Anders Feder (talk) 01:24, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
@Anders Feder: So you are sure about yourself and doubtful about others?
1: So what's the role of huffington post and alalam there? (Although it is not your edition! sorry for the mistake)
2: What's the role of there?
3: Did you call Huffington post a Blog? Which blog do you mean exactly. Parts you removed are mainly from Huffington post!
4: When some parts are not neutral it does not mean that you can delete it, at most you could help it becoming neutral by making copy editions and adding balancing sources. Again, you removed parts from huffington post.
By assuming your good faith in editing the article I won't count them as vandalism. So please help in reaching the consensus. Mhhossein (talk) 13:39, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
  1. Shaykh Saleem Bhimji. "Arbaeen of Imam Husayn". www.al-mubin.org.
Categories: