Misplaced Pages

Christopher Gillberg: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:54, 15 July 2006 editDaphne A (talk | contribs)402 edits See Talk← Previous edit Revision as of 10:20, 15 July 2006 edit undo82.10.32.221 (talk) Criticism and controversyNext edit →
Line 41: Line 41:


==Criticism and controversy== ==Criticism and controversy==
Gillberg's research showed that roughly ten percent of all children have either DAMP, or other ] problems. His results regarding DAMP have been criticised by the ] Eva Kärfve at the ], and the ] Leif Elinder. They accused Gillberg of forging his data. Gothenburg University performed an internal investigation, dismissing the accusations. Kärfve and Elinder (as private persons) then demanded access to the research material behind the so-called Gothenburg study about DAMP, but the university denied them this. They then took the matter to court, where it was decided that the two critics would be allowed to access some of the research material, although the material on patients falls under privacy restrictions. Gillberg's research showed that roughly ten percent of all children have either DAMP, or other ] problems. His results regarding DAMP have been criticised by the ] Eva Kärfve at the ], and the ] Leif Elinder. They accused Gillberg of forging his data. Gothenburg University then performed an internal investigation. Gillberg announced that the conclusion of this investiation was that there had been no misconduct.


Kärfve and Elinder (as private persons) then demanded access to the research material behind the so-called Gothenburg study about DAMP, but the university denied them this. They then took the matter to court, where it was decided that the two critics would be allowed to access some of the research material, although the material on patients falls under privacy restrictions.
In May 2004, three of Gillberg's coworkers destroyed the 12–27 years old research material, claiming that the privacy of the participating patients would have been violated had it been handed to Kärfve and Elinder. In June 2005, Gillberg and the rector of Gothenburg University were convicted for not handing the material over to Kärfve and Elinder. After the destruction of most of the research material, investigation into potential misconduct became essentially impossible, and the investigation was halted. Gillberg continues his work.

In May 2004, three of Gillberg's coworkers destroyed the 12–27 years old research material (roughly 100.000 pages), claiming that the privacy of the participating patients would have been violated had it been handed to Kärfve and Elinder. In June 2005, Gillberg and the rector of Gothenburg University were convicted for not handing the material over to Kärfve and Elinder. After the destruction of most of the research material, investigation into potential misconduct became essentially impossible, and investigation was halted.

Regarding the internal investigation at Gothenburg University, this was conducted by Ove Lundgren, Professor in Physiology and Chairman of the Ethics Committee at the university. He said the following in a letter to the Dean, Gunnar Svedberg (dated 2005-02-21):
{{quotation|I made it perfectly clear to the Gillberg group (C Gillberg, P
Rasmussen) that I - based my four hour inspection - never could
certify that there had not been a misconduct of research. I have
never in my professional life been used in such a
way as I have been used in this affair.}}


== Bibliography == == Bibliography ==

Revision as of 10:20, 15 July 2006

Christopher Gillberg, born 1950, is professor of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry at Gothenburg University in Gothenburg, Sweden, and at the medical college St George's, University of London, in Tooting (in south London).

Gillberg is known for his research of autism in children, DAMP, Asperger syndrome and ADHD. He was the founding editor of the journal European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, and author and editor of several scientific and educational books. He is the recipient of several scientific awards, including the Philips Nordic Prize 2004 for neurological research, and he has more than 300 scientific papers listed in Medline.

In 2003, Gillberg was accused of having committed scientific fraud for much of his career. In 2005, most of the records of Gillberg's research were deliberately destroyed by Gillberg; for that, Gillberg was convicted (by a Swedish court) of misuse of office and contempt of court. The destruction of the potential evidence ended investigations into misconduct. Gillberg maintains his innocence of misconduct.


Gillberg's Criteria for Asperger's Disorder

Gillberg's criteria are as follows (all six criteria must be met for confirmation of diagnosis) (Gillberg and Gillberg 1989) (Attwood 195-196)

  1. Severe impairment in reciprocal social interaction (at least two of the following)
    1. inability to interact with peers
    2. lack of desire to interact with peers
    3. lack of appreciation of social cues
    4. socially and emotionally inappropriate behavior
  2. All-absorbing narrow interest (at least one of the following)
    1. exclusion of other activities
    2. repetitive adherence
    3. more rote than meaning
  3. Imposition of routines and interests (at least one of the following)
    1. on self, in aspects of life
    2. on others
  4. Speech and language problems (at least three of the following)
    1. delayed development
    2. superficially perfect expressive language
    3. formal, pedantic language
    4. odd prosody, peculiar voice characteristics
    5. impairment of comprehension including misinterpretations of literal/implied meanings
  5. Non-verbal communication problems (at least one of the following)
    1. limited use of gestures
    2. clumsy/gauche body language
    3. limited facial expression
    4. inappropriate expression
    5. peculiar, stiff gaze
  6. Motor clumsiness: poor performance on neurodevelopmental examination

(Note that these criteria are somewhat different than those given in DSM-IV-TR.)

DAMP, MBD, and ADHD

Gillberg played a leading role in developing the concept DAMP (Deficits in Attention, Motor control and Perception) in the 1980s. The new concept was partly based on previous attempts to define diagnostic criteria for MBD (Minimal Brain Dysfunction). Around 1990 DAMP had become a generally accepted diagnostic concept in the Nordic countries. DAMP is essentially equivalent to ADHD in combination with DCD as defined by DSM-IV. (In the WHO system, it would be a hyperkinetic disorder combined with a developmental disorder of motor function.) About half of the children with ADHD are claimed to also have DCD.

Criticism and controversy

Gillberg's research showed that roughly ten percent of all children have either DAMP, or other neurological problems. His results regarding DAMP have been criticised by the sociologist Eva Kärfve at the University of Lund, and the pediatrician Leif Elinder. They accused Gillberg of forging his data. Gothenburg University then performed an internal investigation. Gillberg announced that the conclusion of this investiation was that there had been no misconduct.

Kärfve and Elinder (as private persons) then demanded access to the research material behind the so-called Gothenburg study about DAMP, but the university denied them this. They then took the matter to court, where it was decided that the two critics would be allowed to access some of the research material, although the material on patients falls under privacy restrictions.

In May 2004, three of Gillberg's coworkers destroyed the 12–27 years old research material (roughly 100.000 pages), claiming that the privacy of the participating patients would have been violated had it been handed to Kärfve and Elinder. In June 2005, Gillberg and the rector of Gothenburg University were convicted for not handing the material over to Kärfve and Elinder. After the destruction of most of the research material, investigation into potential misconduct became essentially impossible, and investigation was halted.

Regarding the internal investigation at Gothenburg University, this was conducted by Ove Lundgren, Professor in Physiology and Chairman of the Ethics Committee at the university. He said the following in a letter to the Dean, Gunnar Svedberg (dated 2005-02-21):

I made it perfectly clear to the Gillberg group (C Gillberg, P

Rasmussen) that I - based my four hour inspection - never could certify that there had not been a misconduct of research. I have never in my professional life been used in such a

way as I have been used in this affair.

Bibliography

  • A Guide to Asperger Syndrome, Cambridge University Press, 2002 (author).
  • Clinical Child Neuropsychiatry, Cambridge University Press, 1995 (author).

References

White C. (2005), "Swedish court rules against doctor at centre of row over destroyed research data", British Medical Journal, 331: 180.

External links

Categories: