| Revision as of 23:16, 26 December 2014 editLivelikemusic (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers55,375 edits Caution: Unconstructive editing on The Pinkprint. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:20, 26 December 2014 edit undoLivelikemusic (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers55,375 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on The Pinkprint. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
| * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's ]. | * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's ]. | ||
| Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's ], and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through ]. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in ]. ''Precedent takes hold over one other article's way of doing said-format; infoboxes are meant for an over-view of material, not to be clutter with fluff information.''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> ''']''' ] 23:16, 26 December 2014 (UTC) | Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's ], and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through ]. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in ]. ''Precedent takes hold over one other article's way of doing said-format; infoboxes are meant for an over-view of material, not to be clutter with fluff information.''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> ''']''' ] 23:16, 26 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''']''' ] 23:20, 26 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:20, 26 December 2014
Welcome!
|
The Pinkprint
Would you like to tell me how my edit was inaccurate? You can look at the album scans here: http://nmvisuals.com/thumbnails.php?album=92 and see that I added nothing false. You revered tons of legitimate information and unless you have some type of booklet that's completely different than everyone else's you shouldn't be reverting information that's in an album booklet that you obviously don't have. MusicLover (talk) 22:40, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
Can you please not add & remove the names of producers in the info box at the top of the page. It is not aligning with the names of the producers on the track listing and you seem to be editing the info box back when it contains the names of the correct producers (necessarily added and removed). It would be nice if the names in both the track listing and the info box were the same which is what I am trying to do but you seem to be editing it back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dpatterson11 (talk • contribs) 12:51, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
The Pinkprint
Just wanted to make sure you know that I'm not trying to discredit your work on The Pinkprint in any way, and that I hope that we can collaborate together and get this article to GA after the initial release period is settled. I was thinking that the release section can talk about how many different track listings there are for the record, and also touch on the shortened songs on the Target version and the "Anaconda" instrumental flub. What do you think of that idea? WikiRedactor (talk) 22:12, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- Is it really necessary to add how many different track listings there are for the record though? Most albums have exclusives for various retailers so this is quite common. The Anaconda instrumental mishap is already added and there really isn't any more to it than that. Contributor82 (talk) 22:20, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah I see what you're saying, I just found it particularly interesting that one of the versions shortened virtually all of the songs for the sake of adding a couple others. I've restructured the post-production bit a little bit, how do you feel about this current edit? WikiRedactor (talk) 22:28, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- Is it really necessary to add how many different track listings there are for the record though? Most albums have exclusives for various retailers so this is quite common. The Anaconda instrumental mishap is already added and there really isn't any more to it than that. Contributor82 (talk) 22:20, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
December 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at The Pinkprint. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Precedent takes hold over one other article's way of doing said-format; infoboxes are meant for an over-view of material, not to be clutter with fluff information. livelikemusic 23:16, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at The Pinkprint shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. livelikemusic 23:20, 26 December 2014 (UTC)