| Revision as of 17:04, 30 December 2014 edit200.83.101.225 (talk) →Attacks: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:05, 30 December 2014 edit undo200.83.101.225 (talk) If you're going to delete what I've put on your talk page, then you can fuck right off out of mine.Next edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. The thread is ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. —]<font color="#FF9F00">☆</font>] 14:39, 30 December 2014 (UTC) | Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. The thread is ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. —]<font color="#FF9F00">☆</font>] 14:39, 30 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == Occurrences of numerals == | |||
| Please stop edit warring on the deletion template. This states rather clearly "If this template is removed, '''do not replace it'''." (Bold in the original). - ] (]) 17:02, 30 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Attacks == | == Attacks == | ||
Revision as of 17:05, 30 December 2014
Welcome back
Hi, I'm glad you came back. And I'll ping Drmies again. Once more, I'm sorry for using the word "vandal". However, I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for apologies from others if I were you, and please keep it dialled all the way down in the aspersions casting - and if possible ping me or Drmies when the reverting starts rather than carrying it so far. Or come to my talk page and kick me there. (For one thing one of us may be able to think of a different wording to fix the article.) Yngvadottir (talk) 16:31, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'll be in touch if I run into problems and will endeavour to drop you a line before they really become problems. No worries about the v-word. I was upset that you described me as having been known by it, because it a) wasn't true, and b) could very easily encourage those who believe I was, or am, any such thing.
- Wasn't holding my breath but I was very pleased to see one apology actually given. It's perpetually disappointing that people are free to slander me in as base a way as they please, and there is barely an iota of community pressure for them to ever admit that they were wrong. 200.83.101.225 (talk) 21:51, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Problems...
User:Drmies and User:Yngvadottir, if you have the time, I would appreciate your thoughts on my recent edits to Motifs in the James Bond film series. My carefully explained edits are being undone with unhelpful claims like "not an improvement", with no attempt being made by the reverters to justify their actions. Also, there is an absurd situation at Paul Keating in which people wish to mention a speech without explaining what it contained or why it might be important. Thank you very much. 200.83.101.225 (talk) 14:08, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- As you see, I have waded in, and now edited, at Paul Keating. On the James Bond article, there are several different parts to your edit(s) and I'm having difficulty getting it all straight, so I haven't yet waded in there. I think it's going to have to be broken down into elements to be usefully discussed and worked on. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:24, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Also did some further editing following your work at Paul Keating, hope you don't mind. Thanks. 200.83.101.225 (talk) 16:27, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:200.83.101.225 reported by User:MelbourneStar (Result: ). Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆ 14:39, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Attacks
User:Drmies and User:Yngvadottir, I would appreciate it if you could give your opinion on User:Schrocat. They are posting absurdly contradictory arguments on several talk page discussions, seemingly with the intention of fatally disrupting any discussion, and now they are stalking my edits and acting disruptively, removing a prod tag on an article that they certainly have no interest in. I regard their behaviour as problematic and disruptive. I'd appreciate your thoughts on the matter. 200.83.101.225 (talk) 17:04, 30 December 2014 (UTC)