| Revision as of 17:11, 16 July 2006 editMailer diablo (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators55,576 edits Closing debate; result was nomination withdrawn← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:17, 13 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWBNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| *Now it's redirected I '''withdraw the deletion nomination'''. ] 16:31, 12 July 2006 (UTC) | *Now it's redirected I '''withdraw the deletion nomination'''. ] 16:31, 12 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | ||
Revision as of 04:17, 13 February 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was nomination withdrawn. Mailer Diablo 17:11, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Dancing Matt
Can't find anything to indicate this guy's notability, but 'internet phenomena' are hard to pin down. Let's see what the editors think. DJ Clayworth 15:59, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment; I see the contested speedy deletion notice, and since the page is only minutes old, I say we wait a day or two to see if and how this develops. ONUnicorn 16:01, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, only thing that the page has is one sentence and an image with no copyright info. The rest was just cut and pasted from the 'official site', so I removed it. However, there's surprisingly about 30000 hits on google for "dancing matt" so it might qualify as 'notable' if rewritten, at least as far as internet phenomena go. - Bobet 17:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete or redirect to Matt Harding. BuckRose 17:58, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete or redirect as above. No reason to have two articles on this borderline-at-best meme. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:56, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment; Since there's already an article about him with a different name, I'll take the liberty to redirect. ONUnicorn 15:48, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- Now it's redirected I withdraw the deletion nomination. DJ Clayworth 16:31, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.