Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 23:22, 17 January 2015

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2
Archive 3	Archive 4
Archive 5	Archive 6- The Beginning

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Where's the beef?. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! - Victor Victoria (talk) 22:50, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Routine notification

Please read this notification carefully:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Gamergate controversy.
The details of these sanctions are described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Gamaliel (talk) 05:42, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles, as you did to Frankfurt School. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. 09I500 (talk) 11:00, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Um...

I'm not sure it's the best idea to slander journalists like @Auerbachkeller: with accusations like "anti-feminist". Not only might that violate WP:BLP, I remember all the salt when David wrote that pretty good criticism of Misplaced Pages. --DSA510 Pls No AndN 02:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

• I was going to tell you I never claimed that, but went back and read my post. I don't know his stance on feminism, but meant that people who have media access or are semi-famous have Jimbo's ear, and both are either pro-GG or anti-feminist. I think Metamagician is both, I have no idea what Auerbach's position on feminism is. So, you're right. Dave Dial (talk) 02:54, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

If you continue personal attacks, you will be blocked

I want you to stop this kind of nonsense immediately:

• You are exactly right, and Auerbach and Mr.Magicmagician have Jimbo's ear. Both very much pro-GG andor anti-womanfeminism. Dave Dial (talk) 01:17, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

This kind of personal attack is outrageous not least because it is false. Mr. Auerbach is neither pro-GG nor anti-feminism. --Jimbo Wales (talk) 22:50, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

• You are going to block me for having an opinion, Jimbo? I believe that it's true, and nothing you say or threaten me with is going to change it. Perhaps you should take a class on 'free speech' to coincide with the 'free speech activist' claim you make. Take some of the $500k you got from the UAE(a bastion of freedoms). Why don't you go back to trying to get more RTs on Twitter than David Cameron to show people how much you support a cause. In theory, but not practice. Thanks. Dave Dial (talk) 23:22, 17 January 2015 (UTC)