| Revision as of 00:52, 31 January 2015 editThirdright (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers45,531 edits →Arbitration request for enforcement: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:55, 4 February 2015 edit undoTheobald Tiger (talk | contribs)1,164 edits →January 2015Next edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| == January 2015 == | == January 2015 == | ||
| ] This is your '''only warning'''; if you make ] on other people again, as you did at ], you may be '''] without further notice'''. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.<!-- Template:uw-npa4im --> ] (]) 23:42, 30 January 2015 (UTC) | ] This is your '''only warning'''; if you make ] on other people again, as you did at ], you may be '''] without further notice'''. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.<!-- Template:uw-npa4im --> ] (]) 23:42, 30 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :As the criticisms are striking, POV-pushers become aggressive. You know nothing of NRMs and cults, you what primary sources really are, your objections to encyclopedic content are based upon prejudice and self-interest. Your means are wikilawyering, taking the moral high ground, lying, insinuating and denying the obvious. ] (]) 09:55, 4 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbitration request for enforcement == | == Arbitration request for enforcement == | ||
Revision as of 09:55, 4 February 2015
Vindication
Thought you might be interested in seeing Josq's comments at the WP:ARCA page, which basically indicate that you were actually doing good and welcome productive work on the Landmark content. If you have any interest in returning at any time, I hope you know that, basically, your name has been cleared in this matter. John Carter (talk) 16:34, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- And I saw on the Dutch wiki you were unblocked by good old Wikiklaas. Drmies (talk) 19:12, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Arbitration clarification request closed
This is a courtesy message to inform you that an arbitration clarification request in which you were listed as a party has been closed and archived with a motion being enacted which authorises standard discretionary sanctions for the topic of Landmark Worldwide, broadly construed. For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
January 2015
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at List of new religious movement and cult researchers, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Tgeairn (talk) 23:42, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- As the criticisms are striking, POV-pushers become aggressive. You know nothing of NRMs and cults, you do not even know what primary sources really are, your objections to encyclopedic content are based upon prejudice and self-interest. Your means are wikilawyering, taking the moral high ground, lying, insinuating and denying the obvious. Theobald Tiger (talk) 09:55, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Arbitration request for enforcement
You are involved in a recently-filed request for enforcement from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Theobald_Tiger and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Misplaced Pages:Arbitration guide may be of use.
Thanks, Tgeairn (talk) 00:52, 31 January 2015 (UTC)