| Revision as of 17:52, 1 February 2015 editHJ Mitchell (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators121,847 edits →breaking of topic ban.: r← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:54, 1 February 2015 edit undoHJ Mitchell (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators121,847 edits →breaking of topic ban.: eh? That wasn't there when I hit edit, and I didn't get an edit conflict...Next edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| Which one edit disturb you? None of them touched on Israel-Palestine issues. They were geographical or about towns inside pre-1967 Israel. ] (]) 17:32, 1 February 2015 (UTC) | Which one edit disturb you? None of them touched on Israel-Palestine issues. They were geographical or about towns inside pre-1967 Israel. ] (]) 17:32, 1 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | |||
| :: Sigh, the topic ban is broadly constructed, just stay away from articles on Israel /Palestine. Touching articles like ] is clearly forbidden. And then and .....in view of from the same IP? Seriously, ] (]) 17:44, 1 February 2015 (UTC) | :: Sigh, the topic ban is broadly constructed, just stay away from articles on Israel /Palestine. Touching articles like ] is clearly forbidden. And then and .....in view of from the same IP? Seriously, ] (]) 17:44, 1 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ::: ] came up when I editted ] so I added it. I will not use IP anymore. ] (]) 17:49, 1 February 2015 (UTC) | ::: ] came up when I editted ] so I added it. I will not use IP anymore. ] (]) 17:49, 1 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | *I was seriously considering lifting the topic ban, but you've violated it twice today alone. Sure, adding geographical and similar content to articles about towns in Israel would not be covered by the topic ban, because the topic ban is from the Arab-Israeli conflict rather than anything that concerns only Israel or only Palestine/Arabia, but the ] article clearly ''is'' covered by the topic ban, as is all of the content you added . I'm afraid I've blocked you for a fortnight for the violations. That's longer than normal for a first topic-ban violation because of the length of your previous block, but that itself was longer than I would have thought necessary so if you ask me in a week I'll consider lifting the block. If you demonstrate for a few weeks after that that you can stick to the topic ban, I'll reconsider lifting that as well. ] | ] 17:52, 1 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == Google books == | == Google books == | ||
Revision as of 17:54, 1 February 2015
 Archives |
Disambiguation link notification for January 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mahane Yehuda Market, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TimeOut (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
breaking of topic ban.
You received a topic ban from Israel/Palestine area on the 27th of January, logged Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee/Discretionary_sanctions/Log/2015#Palestine-Israel_articles. User:HJ Mitchell said he would think about it; he didn´t promise to undo it. In spite of this, nearly all your edits since that day have been violations of your topic ban, please stop. Huldra (talk) 17:10, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Which one edit disturb you? None of them touched on Israel-Palestine issues. They were geographical or about towns inside pre-1967 Israel. Ashtul (talk) 17:32, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Sigh, the topic ban is broadly constructed, just stay away from articles on Israel /Palestine. Touching articles like Acre Prison break is clearly forbidden. And then this and this .....in view of this from the same IP? Seriously, Huldra (talk) 17:44, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Acre Prison break came up when I editted Shavei Tzion so I added it. I will not use IP anymore. Ashtul (talk) 17:49, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- I was seriously considering lifting the topic ban, but you've violated it twice today alone. Sure, adding geographical and similar content to articles about towns in Israel would not be covered by the topic ban, because the topic ban is from the Arab-Israeli conflict rather than anything that concerns only Israel or only Palestine/Arabia, but the Acre Prison break article clearly is covered by the topic ban, as is all of the content you added here. I'm afraid I've blocked you for a fortnight for the violations. That's longer than normal for a first topic-ban violation because of the length of your previous block, but that itself was longer than I would have thought necessary so if you ask me in a week I'll consider lifting the block. If you demonstrate for a few weeks after that that you can stick to the topic ban, I'll reconsider lifting that as well. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:52, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Google books
I see many references from Google book but many of them do not me see the page referenced. What am I missing? Ashtul (talk) 17:38, 1 February 2015 (UTC)