Revision as of 17:41, 20 July 2006 editMDP23 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,211 edits add bullet point← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:04, 20 July 2006 edit undoHunter91 (talk | contribs)139 edits deleted votes by sock puppets do not put back onNext edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*Just plain '''Delete'''. ] 22:24, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | *Just plain '''Delete'''. ] 22:24, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
*'''redirect''' probable search term. Not really seeing anything worth merging. --] 23:26, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | *'''redirect''' probable search term. Not really seeing anything worth merging. --] 23:26, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
*'''Delete''' "battle field 2", everything mentioned in original is alot better--] 14:04, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
*'''Merge''' this page should be merged it has valuable contrabutions and a vandal delted the icon for it to be merged. {{unsigned|Hunter91}} | *'''Merge''' this page should be merged it has valuable contrabutions and a vandal delted the icon for it to be merged. {{unsigned|Hunter91}} | ||
**'''Comment''' I removed the merge template replacing it with an AfD, as with an afd the decision can be merge. As I wrote in my nom, there was a lack of consensus on the talk page which is why I took the steps which I have done. ] 15:23, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | **'''Comment''' I removed the merge template replacing it with an AfD, as with an afd the decision can be merge. As I wrote in my nom, there was a lack of consensus on the talk page which is why I took the steps which I have done. ] 15:23, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
* '''Redirect''' to ], or just '''Delete'''. <font face="verdana"><small>]</small><nowiki>]</sup>|<sub>]</sub></font>] 15:30, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | * '''Redirect''' to ], or just '''Delete'''. <font face="verdana"><small>]</small><nowiki>]</sup>|<sub>]</sub></font>] 15:30, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
* '''Delete''' This page is useless and has a much better predessor. --] 14:37, 20 July 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:04, 20 July 2006
Battle Field 2
Dispute on talk page as to whether the page should be merged in Battlefield 2 or just deleted. The article is badly written, contains virtually no information already included in Battlefield 2 and should be deleted, judging by the poor quality of its contents and the lack of useful info. Martinp23 20:22, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Merge any worthwile content (I'm not sure that there is) then Redirect WilyD 20:40, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Just plain Delete. Artw 22:24, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- redirect probable search term. Not really seeing anything worth merging. --Pboyd04 23:26, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Merge this page should be merged it has valuable contrabutions and a vandal delted the icon for it to be merged. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hunter91 (talk • contribs)
- Comment I removed the merge template replacing it with an AfD, as with an afd the decision can be merge. As I wrote in my nom, there was a lack of consensus on the talk page which is why I took the steps which I have done. Martinp23 15:23, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect to Battlefield 2, or just Delete. JD 15:30, 19 July 2006 (UTC)