| Revision as of 00:28, 9 March 2015 editWinkelvi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers30,145 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Leonard Nimoy. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:31, 9 March 2015 edit undoATS (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers17,744 edits →March 2015: not a fair assessmentNext edit → | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
| :No, I was not making a point in any fashion, ATinySilver seems to have no problem, YOU only appear to have a problem, you just appear to hate me. There was plenty of unreferenced info, I added the citation needed template. -- ] (]) 00:25, 9 March 2015 (UTC) | :No, I was not making a point in any fashion, ATinySilver seems to have no problem, YOU only appear to have a problem, you just appear to hate me. There was plenty of unreferenced info, I added the citation needed template. -- ] (]) 00:25, 9 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :::Placing cn tags everywhere is also tendentious, pointy, and disruptive. If you don't stop, I will have no qualms about reporting you at the appropriate noticeboard for disruptive editing. No one "hates" you, but your behavior is definitely disruptive and needs to stop. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 00:27, 9 March 2015 (UTC) | :::Placing cn tags everywhere is also tendentious, pointy, and disruptive. If you don't stop, I will have no qualms about reporting you at the appropriate noticeboard for disruptive editing. No one "hates" you, but your behavior is definitely disruptive and needs to stop. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 00:27, 9 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
| I must ask anyone and everyone to not provide any appearance that I am taking sides in any fight (or potential fight) in which I have no dog, metaphorically. I was helping with Wikicode; nothing more. —]<b>/</b>] 00:31, 9 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | ||
Revision as of 00:31, 9 March 2015
| This is Joseph Prasad's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 |
This is my talk page. Leave me messages here.
Glen Campbell
Other articles like Reba McEntire, George Jones, Jo Dee Messina, Tanya Tucker, Willie Nelson, Waylon Jennings, Loretta Lynn, etc. use this. Also, note that what you said here, you said "other main careers", but Campbell has had a variety show called The Glen Campbell Goodtime Hour on CBS television and has been in other filmography. Just because Taylor Swift doesn't have doesn't mean others do. Corkythehornetfan | Chat? 06:05, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- Corkythehornetfan, There is no reason, as there is no other career section, all those articles aren't Good Articles, except for Reba McEntire, which is also known for acting. Also, he is not known for acting, why do you think he has infobox musical artist instead of person? -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 06:09, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Okay, but it doesn't make since to have all of the sections in the GC article to be level 2 sections headers. The sections for his career should be listed under a main level 2 section heading and the following as section 3 or lower. Let's be consistent with most other musician articles. Corkythehornetfan | Chat? 06:13, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Recent edit to Pink (singer)
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. The stylized version of her name is covered in the lead, but per WP:STAGENAME, the most commonly used name should be the name of the page (which it is), and that name should match the name in the infobox. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Onel5969 (talk) 13:17, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Death Battle
Hello, I'm 85.210.181.124. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Death Battle without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! 85.210.181.124 (talk) 20:09, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
List of 2015 albums
Sure a reason!!!!! I was just adding TWO new albums out in July! But u destroyed my work! Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trickykidd (talk • contribs) 06:52, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Trickykidd, well, you could have mentioned that in your edit summary, and it is not much work. Not hard to press the revert button. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 06:56, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
Well, you are right. To add the third quarter was not much work! But u deleted it while i was adding new albums. THIS was much work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trickykidd (talk • contribs) 06:59, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Well, just know to provide what you were doing in the edit summary. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 07:11, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- I always did Trickykidd (talk) 07:13, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, but you didn't provide enough, your edit summary was very broad, and made it seem like you were adding a section for no reason. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 07:15, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I Know (Drake Bell song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Drake's Album
Stop trying to make it a mixtape. It literally doesn't matter what he wants to call it to keep his fans from being disappointed in the quality, the fact that it was sold for $12.99 on iTunes and allegedly fulfills a 4 album contract with Cash Money is proof enough that it's an album. Drop the issue, because I won't. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinw303 (talk • contribs) 16:41, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- For one, that's original research, two, if that fufilled the contract, he wouldn't be making Views from the 6 with the same label. Three, Billboard says it's a mixtape. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 19:10, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Template:Citation needed
You can use {{cn}} for short. Properly factored, it looks like {{cn|date=March 2015}} 
—ATinySliver/ 00:22, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
March 2015
Your placement of the referencing tag at the Leonard Nimoy article with this edit was disruptive and tendentious as well as pointy rather than constructive and helpful. I have removed the tag per WP:DETAG and suggest you read the subsequent section of that same article, found here . If you have issues with the article, discuss them on the talk page but don't edit disruptively to make a point. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 00:22, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- No, I was not making a point in any fashion, ATinySilver seems to have no problem, YOU only appear to have a problem, you just appear to hate me. There was plenty of unreferenced info, I added the citation needed template. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 00:25, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- Placing cn tags everywhere is also tendentious, pointy, and disruptive. If you don't stop, I will have no qualms about reporting you at the appropriate noticeboard for disruptive editing. No one "hates" you, but your behavior is definitely disruptive and needs to stop. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 00:27, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
I must ask anyone and everyone to not provide any appearance that I am taking sides in any fight (or potential fight) in which I have no dog, metaphorically. I was helping with Wikicode; nothing more. —ATinySliver/ 00:31, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 00:28, 9 March 2015 (UTC)