Misplaced Pages

User talk:DPeterson: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:29, 22 July 2006 editAlphachimpbot (talk | contribs)100,435 editsm BOT, Replaced: {{blatantvandal => {{subst:blatantvandal,← Previous edit Revision as of 23:33, 22 July 2006 edit undoDPeterson (talk | contribs)4,116 edits remove vandalism to my talk pageNext edit →
Line 13: Line 13:
Hi there! I have taken the mediation case listed ]. I have replied on the article's talk page, so if you could reply there with your perspective on this issue that would be great! Hopefully we can work things out. Cheers, ''']'']'']''' 07:37, 27 May 2006 (UTC) Hi there! I have taken the mediation case listed ]. I have replied on the article's talk page, so if you could reply there with your perspective on this issue that would be great! Hopefully we can work things out. Cheers, ''']'']'']''' 07:37, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
:Regarding your question on my talk page, I wish I could accept the solution, but this would not resolve the dispute. I have already offered a compromise where '''both''' DDT and Theraplay could be mentioned in the article, just not in the '''See Also''' section. I still believe this is the best way forward, although I respect the advocate's suggestion (keep in mind that it is his duty to be biased in favour of his client, while I am striving to listen to both sides). ''']'']'']''' 03:01, 2 July 2006 (UTC) :Regarding your question on my talk page, I wish I could accept the solution, but this would not resolve the dispute. I have already offered a compromise where '''both''' DDT and Theraplay could be mentioned in the article, just not in the '''See Also''' section. I still believe this is the best way forward, although I respect the advocate's suggestion (keep in mind that it is his duty to be biased in favour of his client, while I am striving to listen to both sides). ''']'']'']''' 03:01, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

== Please stop vandalizing other users' comments ==

] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the ] if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to ], are considered ]. If you continue in this manner you may be '''blocked from editing without further warning'''. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. <!-- Template:blatantvandal-n --> ] 01:07, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

There has been no vandalism...but your personal attacks are not coducive to building consensus or a collaborative relationship. ] 01:09, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

:Changing the title of a section is vandalism. Pretending that it is done for NPVO doesn't wash on a talk page -- where POV's can be aired and discussed. Changing the comments (including titles) of another user on a talk page is specifically listed by Wiki as vandalism. I see that you have done it again...revert your change, or let's go to Wiki administration about this conduct. ] 04:16, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Sarner's deletion and moving of other's comments on ], constitue Vandalism and have been reported.

:Oh, really? And the deliberate muddling of a vote section isn't vandalism? All I did was enter a heading (and explanation) between your comments about another person's vote and that person's vote. Where's the "deletion"? Where's the "moving"? For that matter, where's the vandalism? ] 04:16, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

:: Please stop. You edited (moved and changed setting) of my comments and I believe that constitutes Vandalism...but if I read the Misplaced Pages policy incorrectly, I apologize. Please refrain from adding material to this page that is irrelevant. Otherwise I will delete it. ]

== Vandalism via New Article ==

] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the ] if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered ], and if you continue in this manner you may be '''] from editing without further warning'''. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. <!-- Template:Blatantvandal (serious warning) -->

Your actions are transparent. The actions of you and your puppet-master, Arthur Becker-Weidman, are those of Wiki terrorists, IMHO.

] 14:39, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:33, 22 July 2006

Welcome!

Hello, DPeterson, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Brisvegas 07:37, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Mediation @ the John Bowlby article

Hi there! I have taken the mediation case listed here. I have replied on the article's talk page, so if you could reply there with your perspective on this issue that would be great! Hopefully we can work things out. Cheers, Brisvegas 07:37, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Regarding your question on my talk page, I wish I could accept the solution, but this would not resolve the dispute. I have already offered a compromise where both DDT and Theraplay could be mentioned in the article, just not in the See Also section. I still believe this is the best way forward, although I respect the advocate's suggestion (keep in mind that it is his duty to be biased in favour of his client, while I am striving to listen to both sides). Brisvegas 03:01, 2 July 2006 (UTC)