| Revision as of 16:38, 21 March 2015 editJBW (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators195,946 edits Block notice← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:49, 21 March 2015 edit undoGospel veracity (talk | contribs)51 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for persistent disruptive editing, including bad-faith accusations of vandalism, and using this account to evade a block. I have examined your whole editing history, and it is clear that you are never likely to make constructive contributions to the project. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the ] first. <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "]" (]) 16:38, 21 March 2015 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-blockindef --> | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for persistent disruptive editing, including bad-faith accusations of vandalism, and using this account to evade a block. I have examined your whole editing history, and it is clear that you are never likely to make constructive contributions to the project. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the ] first. <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "]" (]) 16:38, 21 March 2015 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-blockindef --> | ||
| {{unblock|reason= So if one of your chosen few is the vandal. Block the person who reports them?}} | |||
Revision as of 16:49, 21 March 2015
HJ Mitchell and Gilliam should not ne allowed to block anyone. They violate Misplaced Pages’s WP:BLP policy, regardless of their personal points of view. And block anyone who disagrees with them. Even neutral edits are labeled by them as vandalism.
HJ Mitchell and Gilliam are vandals. They should not be allowed to block anyone. Without any discussion they blocked me. Even when I I tired to make an entry neutral they labeled me as a vandal and a disruptive editor. It only shows that if you do not agree with them you are blocked.
HJ Mitchell and Gilliam label anyone with dissenting information as vandals/disruptive editors. Therefore they should have no admin privileges because they are in violation of wikipedia policy.
User Smalljim is a Vandal and should not have any admin privleges.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:38, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
Gospel veracity (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
So if one of your chosen few is the vandal. Block the person who reports them?Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=So if one of your chosen few is the vandal. Block the person who reports them? |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=So if one of your chosen few is the vandal. Block the person who reports them? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=So if one of your chosen few is the vandal. Block the person who reports them? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}