Misplaced Pages

User talk:Cali11298: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:54, 4 April 2015 editCali11298 (talk | contribs)155 edits Welcome!← Previous edit Revision as of 03:29, 5 April 2015 edit undoVQuakr (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers39,485 edits Only warning: Personal attack directed at a specific editor on Jesse Helms. (TW)Next edit →
Line 48: Line 48:
Hi, I see you ''are'' new here. There's a lot to learn. Please read all that stuff they posted above in your welcome packet. I hope you learn the local culture quickly and as painlessly as possible. You've already gotten a block, so you might want to slow down and observe awhile before jumping into the fray. Some editors ], which hurts. Misplaced Pages is different from a discussion forum or an academic conference. Best wishes as you learn your way! ] (]) 22:52, 4 April 2015 (UTC) Hi, I see you ''are'' new here. There's a lot to learn. Please read all that stuff they posted above in your welcome packet. I hope you learn the local culture quickly and as painlessly as possible. You've already gotten a block, so you might want to slow down and observe awhile before jumping into the fray. Some editors ], which hurts. Misplaced Pages is different from a discussion forum or an academic conference. Best wishes as you learn your way! ] (]) 22:52, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
::Thank you, ] (]) 22:54, 4 April 2015 (UTC) ::Thank you, ] (]) 22:54, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

== April 2015 ==
] This is your '''only warning'''; if you make ] on other people again, as you did at ], you may be '''] without further notice'''. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ''You are going to need to refrain from stuff like if you want to edit here. Incidentally, you are expected to provide the support for material you add or restore per ].''<!-- Template:uw-npa4im --> ] (]) 03:29, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:29, 5 April 2015

Welcome!

Hello, Cali11298, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Misplaced Pages Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Misplaced Pages.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RFD (talk) 21:56, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

Hi, Caili. I've deleted the edit summary of your recent edit to Bob Menendez. Don't attack living people anywhere on Misplaced Pages, most especially not in edit summaries, which remain in page histories unless they're deleted using admin tools. Thank you. Bishonen | talk 19:42, 2 April 2015 (UTC).

Fine, I won't do it again. Still, that doesn't change the fact Menendez is exactly what I said he was. Regards, Cali11298 (talk) 19:54, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages is not a soapbox for you to advocate your political views. Abandon that behavior now, please. Cullen Let's discuss it 06:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
I already said I wouldn't do it again. Cali11298 (talk) 12:32, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Consensus

Would recommend you get consensus first. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:14, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
So there is no surprises if you continue. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:15, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Abstinence-only sex education. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Binksternet (talk) 01:17, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Cali11298 reported by User:VQuakr (Result: ). Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 02:19, 4 April 2015 (UTC)


Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Kuru (talk) 02:31, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Cali11298 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello, I'd just like to say that I'm sorry for edit warring. Make no mistake - this was my bad, I'm not blaming anyone else, and I shouldn't have done it. It did what I did because I felt my edits were right; however, I now know that you can't edit war even if you feel your changes are correct, that you must achieve consensus first. I'd like to note that I did try to achiveve consensus on the talk page and at least one user agreed with me, I didn't just revert other editors with no explanation. Nevertheless, it is wrong, and I won't do it again. Whenever I get into an edit dispute with someone, I'll make my case on that article's talk page, and not try to re-edit something in. I'm more educated about Misplaced Pages's policies, and am aware I exercised poor judgement. However, I will not behave like this again. For this reason, I'm asking to be unblocked. Cali11298 (talk) 03:06, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Accept reason:

About as perfect an unblock request as I've seen. --jpgordon 03:53, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi, I see you are new here. There's a lot to learn. Please read all that stuff they posted above in your welcome packet. I hope you learn the local culture quickly and as painlessly as possible. You've already gotten a block, so you might want to slow down and observe awhile before jumping into the fray. Some editors bite newbies, which hurts. Misplaced Pages is different from a discussion forum or an academic conference. Best wishes as you learn your way! YoPienso (talk) 22:52, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, Cali11298 (talk) 22:54, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at Jesse Helms, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. You are going to need to refrain from stuff like this if you want to edit here. Incidentally, you are expected to provide the support for material you add or restore per WP:BURDEN. VQuakr (talk) 03:29, 5 April 2015 (UTC)