Revision as of 14:51, 9 April 2015 editKrish! (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,804 edits →Comments by other users← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:25, 10 April 2015 edit undoKrish! (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,804 edits →Comments by other usersNext edit → | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | ||
HUH....I don't need to give any explanations and that to you Krimuk. I wish you peace Krimuk90 and a good heart, which is hard to get at least for you. | |||
I am amazed to see this. Well to be honest I don't know much about Dan0001. Only know that he is also interested in Chopra's articles like I do. I think you are wasting your time and I want an apology. How can you do this? My exams are going on and you have done this. I ask Administrators to check verify so that this can be closed sonn. I have no idea about that user. Who know Dan0001 is Krimuk90 himself. He might be playing safe to get me blocked after planning and making paths to come to this.—] 03:03, 9 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
:I think you have not something of "Co-incidence". Get a life.—] 03:05, 9 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
I have opposed you once but, supported you so many times. ], ] and ]. If I was that user don't you thik I would have opposed simultaneously?—] 03:10, 9 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
For god sake, when this drama will over? Why the hell are administrators not checking right away? This is ridiculous that's why there are no comments on that page. Krimuk90, I will never forgive you for putting me into this trouble with no reasons.—] 14:51, 9 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
Revision as of 10:25, 10 April 2015
Pks1142
Pks1142 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Pks1142/Archive.
This case was moved to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Pks1142 from Prashant! (talk · contribs). Future cases should be placed there.
09 April 2015
– An SPI clerk has endorsed a request for CheckUser. A checkuser will shortly review the case.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Daan0001 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
- In the 3rd FLC nomination of Priyanka Chopra's awards page nominated by Prashant, Daan0001 gave a no-comments added "support" here. This is exactly the same as the 1st FLC nomination of the same page in which Green Parakeet supported the list. To establish a background, Green Parakeet was a confirmed sock of Prashant.
- Also suspicious is how Daan0001's contributions were limited to a maximum of 2-3 edits since October. Their contributions here increased in late-March/April, which is when Prashant nominated the Priyanka Chopra awards page at the FLC.
- Not the only failed FLC of Prashant in which Daan0001 gave such a support. He did so here as well.
- Another similar pattern between Prashant and Daan0001 is to give a straight-out oppose to my FAC nomination, despite them already having supports from established users. Prashant did that here and Daan0001 did the exact same thing here.
- Notice how the previous sock Green Parakeet awarded Prashant with a barnstar for their edits on Priyanka Chopra. Daan0001 gave Prashant a very similar-type of barnstar here.
- And as expected, they have both made significant edits to Chopra-related articles, in particular her film Mary Kom. Look at this and this.
- To conclude, neither of the users are proficient in English, and struggle to string together grammatically correct sentences, as apparent in this thread. Krimuk|90 (talk) 02:33, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
HUH....I don't need to give any explanations and that to you Krimuk. I wish you peace Krimuk90 and a good heart, which is hard to get at least for you.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Clerk endorsed - By the way, this should be merged with Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Pks1142. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:05, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Categories: