| Revision as of 17:27, 21 April 2015 editTITUSIIX (talk | contribs)62 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:35, 21 April 2015 edit undoAnglicanus (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users19,827 edits replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| :::::You will also be running the risk of bringing this organisation into disrepute. It is just stupid to engage in COI editing. ] (]) 17:22, 21 April 2015 (UTC) | :::::You will also be running the risk of bringing this organisation into disrepute. It is just stupid to engage in COI editing. ] (]) 17:22, 21 April 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :::::I do not understand how that is possible. Misplaced Pages is intended to provide such information to anyone and as long as the information provided is accurate, then I do not see how it is within your purview to make decisions on what is relevant and what is not. Please explain this to me. I am not in clear violation, I am a neutral source trying to populate a page with real and legitimate information. | ::::::I do not understand how that is possible. Misplaced Pages is intended to provide such information to anyone and as long as the information provided is accurate, then I do not see how it is within your purview to make decisions on what is relevant and what is not. Please explain this to me. I am not in clear violation, I am a neutral source trying to populate a page with real and legitimate information. | ||
| :::::actually since you are quite knowledgeable, perhaps you could help me understand what the best way is to add information to a lacking page? | :::::::actually since you are quite knowledgeable, perhaps you could help me understand what the best way is to add information to a lacking page? | ||
| ::::::::Everything is explained in the policies. I suggest you read and follow them. It seems more than obvious that you have a very direct personal connection to this group. There is also much more to editing Misplaced Pages than providing information regardless of how accurate it may be. Anglicanus (talk) 17:32, 21 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:35, 21 April 2015
Old Catholic Confederation
It is obvious that you are editing this article in violation of Misplaced Pages's "Conflict of Interest" (COI) policies which can be found at WP:COI. Therefore your edits have been reverted. Please respect this important policy in future. Thank you. Anglicanus (talk) 16:33, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- If you continue editing this article it will be necessary to seek formal restrictions on your account. Anglicanus (talk) 17:09, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Perhaps if you would relax for a few hours, as I am new to this sort of editing I could make the necessary changes with the proper sources. I will continue to edit this page and provide the proper citations. Thank you for vigilant behaviour.
- Don't waste your time. Any further edits by you will be reverted. Your editing is a clear violation of Misplaced Pages's COI policies. If you continue it will be necessary to seek restrictions or sanctions on your future editing. Anglicanus (talk) 17:18, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- You will also be running the risk of bringing this organisation into disrepute. It is just stupid to engage in COI editing. Anglicanus (talk) 17:22, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Don't waste your time. Any further edits by you will be reverted. Your editing is a clear violation of Misplaced Pages's COI policies. If you continue it will be necessary to seek restrictions or sanctions on your future editing. Anglicanus (talk) 17:18, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Perhaps if you would relax for a few hours, as I am new to this sort of editing I could make the necessary changes with the proper sources. I will continue to edit this page and provide the proper citations. Thank you for vigilant behaviour.
- I do not understand how that is possible. Misplaced Pages is intended to provide such information to anyone and as long as the information provided is accurate, then I do not see how it is within your purview to make decisions on what is relevant and what is not. Please explain this to me. I am not in clear violation, I am a neutral source trying to populate a page with real and legitimate information.
- actually since you are quite knowledgeable, perhaps you could help me understand what the best way is to add information to a lacking page?
- Everything is explained in the policies. I suggest you read and follow them. It seems more than obvious that you have a very direct personal connection to this group. There is also much more to editing Misplaced Pages than providing information regardless of how accurate it may be. Anglicanus (talk) 17:32, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- actually since you are quite knowledgeable, perhaps you could help me understand what the best way is to add information to a lacking page?