| Revision as of 23:24, 30 April 2015 editVanjagenije (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators130,613 edits Marking case as closed← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:45, 1 May 2015 edit undoOccultZone (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers224,089 edits →21 April 2015: reNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| :Another special similarity between above IP addresses and Sonic2030 is, that they both use section title as edit summary, similar to the previous socks. ] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 15:26, 29 April 2015 (UTC) | :Another special similarity between above IP addresses and Sonic2030 is, that they both use section title as edit summary, similar to the previous socks. ] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 15:26, 29 April 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ::Should we treat them as socks and semi-protect this article in question for a while? ] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 15:43, 29 April 2015 (UTC) | ::Should we treat them as socks and semi-protect this article in question for a while? ] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 15:43, 29 April 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :::{{yo|DoRD}} I asked it per ], if answer is yes, then sure I can seek protection. ] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 00:45, 1 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | ||
Revision as of 00:45, 1 May 2015
Sonic2030
Sonic2030 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Sonic2030/Archive.
21 April 2015
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- PediaAcc (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- 216.81.94.72 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- 216.81.94.71 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- 216.81.81.80 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- 216.81.94.68 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Long term edit warring on John Coleman (news weathercaster), just previous suspects. This diff matches with diff, as the 96.231 is one of the extension that is frequently used by him. One of his sock, Resaltador (talk · contribs), was also blocked for evading with this extension and the IP was 96.231.161.128.
Also check previous archive, 216.81.94 has been always his major extension. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 06:20, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- I have added PediaAcc. Who was blocked by DoRD, following this discussion.
- Another special similarity between above IP addresses and Sonic2030 is, that they both use section title as edit summary, similar to the previous socks. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 15:26, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- Should we treat them as socks and semi-protect this article in question for a while? OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 15:43, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- @DoRD: I asked it per WP:DENY, if answer is yes, then sure I can seek protection. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 00:45, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Should we treat them as socks and semi-protect this article in question for a while? OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 15:43, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- PediaAcc was already confirmed and blocked days ago, as you noted above, and the IPs are stale for blocking purposes, so what are you asking for here, OccultZone? —DoRD (talk) 15:42, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- That depends on what you mean by
treat them as socks
. If you mean to stick IPsock tags on them, the answer is no. As for protection, RFPP is thataway. —DoRD (talk) 18:12, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- That depends on what you mean by
- Closing the case. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:24, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Categories: