| Revision as of 01:10, 6 May 2015 editEChastain (talk | contribs)2,665 edits →Knowledgekid87: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:16, 6 May 2015 edit undoKnowledgekid87 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers96,754 edits →Knowledgekid87: ReNext edit → | ||
| Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
| Hi. {{u| Knowledgekid87}}, whom you unblocked recently because he assured you he would stop stirring up trouble, is stirring the pot again by posting to Lightbreather with trivia about me. See: <p>Now that Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lightbreather is open, he is getting involved again. He reverted my post to him (the first time I've ever posted on his page) to warn him. He's caused a lot of trouble by this sort of thing. He deleted from his page a reminder from the Arb clerk to stop editing Arbcom pages regarding this case that only arbs and clerks are allowed to edit. Please nip this in the bud before it gets out of hand. He's already been involved in discussions, now hatted, at ]. Hope my asking this isn't an intrusion. But this case already shows signs of becoming a big brouhaha. Please do nip this. Thanks, ] (]) 01:10, 6 May 2015 (UTC) | Hi. {{u| Knowledgekid87}}, whom you unblocked recently because he assured you he would stop stirring up trouble, is stirring the pot again by posting to Lightbreather with trivia about me. See: <p>Now that Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lightbreather is open, he is getting involved again. He reverted my post to him (the first time I've ever posted on his page) to warn him. He's caused a lot of trouble by this sort of thing. He deleted from his page a reminder from the Arb clerk to stop editing Arbcom pages regarding this case that only arbs and clerks are allowed to edit. Please nip this in the bud before it gets out of hand. He's already been involved in discussions, now hatted, at ]. Hope my asking this isn't an intrusion. But this case already shows signs of becoming a big brouhaha. Please do nip this. Thanks, ] (]) 01:10, 6 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :I find it very unusual and disrespectful that you would post a "Mission accomplished" message on edits involving LB when she is subject to an arbcom case. How did you get involved anyways and why have you been tracking her edits? - ] (]) 01:16, 6 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:16, 6 May 2015
 Archives |
|
• Jly 2006 - Nov 2006 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 8 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
| This is Ddstretch's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 8 days  |
| SandBoxes |
|---|
| • CP x Settlmnt |
| • Settlmnt x CP |
| • "Former ..." Artcl |
| • Artcl for CP in Ches |
| • Misc1 |
| • Misc2 |
| • EP Tmplt |
| • CP Tmplt |
| • Crewe Article Sandbox |
| * Arbcom evidence |
Well said
Thanks for your insightful comment at AE.Two kinds of porkBacon 03:44, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- agreed. — Ched : ? 04:37, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Knowledgekid87
Hi. Knowledgekid87, whom you unblocked recently because he assured you he would stop stirring up trouble, is stirring the pot again by posting to Lightbreather with trivia about me. See: Knowledgekid87 posts to Lightbreather to stir the pot
Now that Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lightbreather is open, he is getting involved again. He reverted my post to him (the first time I've ever posted on his page) to warn him. He's caused a lot of trouble by this sort of thing. He deleted from his page a reminder from the Arb clerk to stop editing Arbcom pages regarding this case that only arbs and clerks are allowed to edit. Please nip this in the bud before it gets out of hand. He's already been involved in discussions, now hatted, at Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lightbreather/Evidence. Hope my asking this isn't an intrusion. But this case already shows signs of becoming a big brouhaha. Please do nip this. Thanks, EChastain (talk) 01:10, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- I find it very unusual and disrespectful that you would post a "Mission accomplished" message on edits involving LB when she is subject to an arbcom case. How did you get involved anyways and why have you been tracking her edits? - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 01:16, 6 May 2015 (UTC)