| Revision as of 04:16, 13 May 2015 editBeyond My Ken (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers263,361 edits →Mawano Kambeu← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:01, 13 May 2015 edit undoDGG (talk | contribs)316,874 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| *'''comment.''' Notice to all editors here! Joseph2302 the AFD nominator is taking this issue personal. He has nominated this same article for speedy deletion on the grounds of "undisclosed paid editing". He has really made me cry for the past 24 hours. I don't know why he's attacking all the pages I created so far. He nominated all of them for speedy deletion and then for AFD. There must be vested interest in his mind. I've already alerted Admins about this issue via the appropriate means. Thanks ] (]) 03:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC) | *'''comment.''' Notice to all editors here! Joseph2302 the AFD nominator is taking this issue personal. He has nominated this same article for speedy deletion on the grounds of "undisclosed paid editing". He has really made me cry for the past 24 hours. I don't know why he's attacking all the pages I created so far. He nominated all of them for speedy deletion and then for AFD. There must be vested interest in his mind. I've already alerted Admins about this issue via the appropriate means. Thanks ] (]) 03:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' - Non-notable, promotional. ] (]) 04:16, 13 May 2015 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' - Non-notable, promotional. ] (]) 04:16, 13 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment'' Paid editing, even undeclared paid editing, is not a specific reason for deletion at AfD, but we can delete at AfD any article that the consensus determines is unfit for Misplaced Pages. To avoid confusion, we avoid giving paid editing as the sole reason, and i did not even mention it here. I did not need to. We certainly can and will delete an article about a non-notable subject, or a promotional article regardless of subject, and almost all articles written by undeclared paid editors fail on both grounds, along with a good many of those written by declared paid editors. ''']''' (]) 06:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:01, 13 May 2015
Mawano Kambeu
- Mawano Kambeu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no evidence for notability, besides some PR. Trivial awards, and mentions. There's also an article by the same editor on his firm, and one one of his firm's operating divisions. but trying to make multiple articles with essentially the same content is a purely promotional technique.Borderline notability+promotionalism is reason to delete an article. DGG ( talk ) 22:53, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Doesn't show notability, so fails WP:GNG, and also is clearly WP:PROMO. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:58, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG. Non notable executive. Safiel (talk) 23:42, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- comment Hold on with the delete..I guess a major issue here is that "Joseph2302" discovered that I created the article as a non-disclosed paid wiki writer. He has even nominated same article for Speedy deletion. I have already responded sincerely to him here. Editors please read my story here "" before arriving at the conclusion. ThanksHilumeoka2000 (talk) 23:58, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Just a note that I declined ALL his speedy delete requests as not being valid speedy delete requests. Safiel (talk) 00:02, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Comment As explained on your talkpage, all your articles are still a violation of Wikimedia terms of Use. The issue isn't that I found out, the issue was that you should have disclosed earlier. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:24, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America 01:05, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. North America 01:05, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- comment. Notice to all editors here! Joseph2302 the AFD nominator is taking this issue personal. He has nominated this same article for speedy deletion on the grounds of "undisclosed paid editing". He has really made me cry for the past 24 hours. I don't know why he's attacking all the pages I created so far. He nominated all of them for speedy deletion and then for AFD. There must be vested interest in his mind. I've already alerted Admins about this issue via the appropriate means. Thanks Hilumeoka2000 (talk) 03:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Non-notable, promotional. BMK (talk) 04:16, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- 'Comment Paid editing, even undeclared paid editing, is not a specific reason for deletion at AfD, but we can delete at AfD any article that the consensus determines is unfit for Misplaced Pages. To avoid confusion, we avoid giving paid editing as the sole reason, and i did not even mention it here. I did not need to. We certainly can and will delete an article about a non-notable subject, or a promotional article regardless of subject, and almost all articles written by undeclared paid editors fail on both grounds, along with a good many of those written by declared paid editors. DGG ( talk ) 06:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)