| Revision as of 15:45, 18 May 2015 editSpartaz (talk | contribs)Administrators52,776 edits OneClickArchiver archived 1 discussion to User talk:Spartaz/Archive19← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:45, 18 May 2015 edit undoSpartaz (talk | contribs)Administrators52,776 edits OneClickArchiver archived 1 discussion to User talk:Spartaz/Archive19Next edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| |counter = 19 | |counter = 19 | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| ==Talkback== | |||
| {{talkback|Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive884|seems to be consensus that removing afd comments is ok?????|ts=18:09, 10 May 2015 (UTC)}} | |||
| ]] 18:09, 10 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| : ...why did you edit an archive? — ] <sup>(])</sup> 09:56, 11 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::{{ping|Jeraphine Gryphon}} It wasn't worth un-archiving and putting it back on the main ANI page if Spartaz, the original editor who re-opened the discussion, wasn't going to respond. Unlike other archives where conversations are moved when they're closed or stale (usually 3 months), ANI auto-archives conversations rapidly. It would be auto-archived within 48 hours and likely before anyone had a chance to fully respond given the timeline of the conversation up until then. It was considered though but since the only edit made was to ask if this discussion was still open I did not feel it was particularly impertinent to go through all the motions especially since the original two editors involved had since moved on and this was essentially a continued discussion that could have been moved to user talk pages. ]] 14:56, 11 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Rape jihad, again == | == Rape jihad, again == | ||
Revision as of 15:45, 18 May 2015
 Archives |
|
Archive 1 * Archive 2 * Archive 3 * Archive 4 * Archive 5 * Archive 6 * Archive 7 * Archive 8 * Archive 9 * Archive 10 * Archive 11 * Archive 12 * Archive 13 * Archive 14 * Archive 15 * Archive 16 * Archive 17 * Archive 18 * Archive 19 * Archive 20 * Archive 21 * Archive 22 * Archive 23 * Archive 24 * Archive 25 * Archive 26 * Archive 27 |
Spartaz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
I'm a long term user (first edit 2006) and have been an admin on or off since 2007. When we first started there was so much idealism and we really had no strong policies about inclusion except a desire to have some level of sourcing. As time moved on we became more structured and around the time I became an admin in 2007 we were grappling with the concept of collapsing non notable articles into lists which I was at the forefront of as a regular afd closer and constant presence at DRV. I had a lot of patience once and for that reason was regular DRV closer for a long time after GR Berry left the project. Sadly, my patience was degraded over time and getting involved in the PORNBIO wars pretty much washed out a lot of the good faith that policy and courtesy quite rightly requires us to show. This was again a major change in our approach to content and one of the first SNGs that was deprecated in favour of a more rigid approach to proper sourcing. Since then our content in this area has become much better and we are seeing similar struggles now in the sports arena where SNGs are slowly giving way to GNG level standards.
I have always taken a very legalistic approach to closing discussions that I recognise does not fit well to the current community standard, where low participation level allowing more brigading of votes or allowing more non-policy based arguments. For this reason I'm not really closing discussions but will still happily review old closes. Otherwise I mostly review and nominate unsuitable content as a BLP is a serious matter and needs to be properly sourced.
i am willing to userfy deleted articles for improvement as long as there is a reasonable likelihood that they can be saved. If you are challenging a deletion, do you have three good sources?
Useful Links:
- Please don't leave talkback templates as I always watchlist pages when I edit and I'm perfectly capable of looking for a reply myself.
You may want to increment {{Archive basics}} to |counter= 20 as User talk:Spartaz/Archive19 is larger than the recommended 150Kb.
Rape jihad, again
I had a feeling that someone would have a copy of this article as a user subpage and it exists at User:Раціональне_анархіст/sandbox. Even though the article has been deleted and salted I see no reason to have this copy of a deleted article as it won't be recreated again. If you could also salt Rape Jihad, that would be great, too. Thanks! Liz 23:38, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
ANI discussion
Hi there. A while back you left a message on my talk page about an ANI discussion involving me. I added a message today to that still-open discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive884#Further discussion. Would you have a moment to comment? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:13, 15 May 2015 (UTC)