Revision as of 15:15, 28 July 2006 editLingeron (talk | contribs)461 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:34, 28 July 2006 edit undoAlphachimp (talk | contribs)29,194 edits →[]: waiting til not hereNext edit → | ||
Line 222: | Line 222: | ||
'''Mr. Ose''': Uh, uh, my penis so small.<br> | '''Mr. Ose''': Uh, uh, my penis so small.<br> | ||
--]] 13:09, 28 July 2006 (UTC) | --]] 13:09, 28 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
:I'm going to wait until I'm ''not'' at work to read this ;). ] <sup>]</sup> 15:34, 28 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
==the vandalism or not bot== | ==the vandalism or not bot== |
Revision as of 15:34, 28 July 2006
Re: Family Name not inportantThank you for the removal of the word, NONSENSE. We VELDERS' are a proud family, and WE are ROYALITY dating back to 1207. I am sure that the member of our family has paper proof of this. I was only sent a written letter, in Dutch as to its authenticity. As stated elsewhere, I have been working on my Family tree for over 15 years, and one place where I have spent many an hour each day, for weeks, is the LDS. I have posted post's all over the world seeking our name. Found there are Streets, etc, and plenty of VELDERS.met a Professor in a university of Holland who had come over to hold a sermester for three day, in Athens Ga, University of Athens, and he brought with him his Family Tree. There is/was so much information that I had gathered on line, so I shall re-enter my family member as a Royal member of our VELDERS' FAMILY. What gave me the idea was, I was watching a T.V. station this morning, and saw that the reporters name was brought up on the screen, and it gave a little information about her. I feel that Pieter Velders, a desentant or ROYALITY has just as much, if not more reason to be listed. thank you Philip Velders Sr. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Velders (talk • contribs)
Im FreeHow about a cup of tea and a handshake?!?!?! --Qho 18:20, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
CrosspostingHi again, it seems to me that the last several comments at this AfD should possibly be moved to the talkpage for the article. I wanted to ask you about it because:
Share your thoughts? --Doc Tropics 18:34, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Thanks, I'm glad I asked! I didn't realise that it would be viewed so seriously, but now I can understand why. WP:BOLD is a fine policy, but sometimes it just makes sense to ask first...and now I'm glad I did. Thanks again for taking the time to answer and explain. --Doc Tropics 20:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
3RRIf I recall correctly, the three-revert rule does not apply to cases of vandalism. At first, this was a content dispute, but various other editors (as well as myself) have demanded the anonymous editor to provide sources for his edits, which he has not; he has not even attempted to discuss the issue. At this point it is simply vandalism. Yesterday he continued to vandalize, even after being warned 4 times. He was then blocked for 3 hours, after which he immediately began vandalizing again. I also submitted the vandalized pages to WP:RFP; my request was denied, with the suggestion to simply revert (see here). Trust me, I thought about the 3RR before I started reverting, and if anyone blocks me, I will use that RFP response as my justification. 3RR was meant to prevent legitimate edit wars (over content); this is just vandalism. And I cannot be held guilty for making so many reverts if my request for page protection was denied. What am I supposed to do without page protection—let the guy keep vandalizing? --Larry V (talk | contribs) 18:58, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Aeon needs you helpHello Alphachimp I need your help in a matter. UCRGrad is telling other editors who I'm involved with that he has issue with me being in the AMA. I'm currently handling a case for the Mediation Cabal and feel that these actions could derail any progress I could make. Please see the following User talk:Triddle and User talk:JakGd1 (and my own talk page User talk:Aeon1006) they are the editors that are invloved in a mediation case that I'm Facilitating. Thanks Aeon 22:17, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Thanks Alphachimp, I hope that the matter will cease. Aeon 23:36, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Don't worry it will take more than an abusive editor to stop me from helping the Community (Whether it is Vandal Fighting, Helping membes through Esperanza, or Mediation Cabal) but will take your advice and leaving the computer for a while. A nice long walk will help a great deal. Thanks again Aeon 23:42, 26 July 2006 (UTC) UCRGrad has replied to our posts. He denies Stalking has is saying he has a 'Duty to Warn'. I have a feeling he is not going to stop. What do you recomend? Aeon 00:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC) He is still at it, I have notifed RyanGerbil and asked him to step in Aeon 01:04, 27 July 2006 (UTC) User:LitclassI gave the user a very final warning. I chose not to block, mainly because the reverts have stopped, at least temporarily. Let me know if this user puts even one more toe over the line, because then I will block them. Cheers, RyanGerbil10(The people rejoice!) 23:54, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Av HI see your point. I'll put it back. --Larry V (talk | contribs) 02:05, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
NYCS simplebusI was thinking that you should probably rename {{NYCS simplebus}} to something like {{NYC simplebus}}. My more complex template, {{NYCS bus}}, was never intended for use outside of "Bus connections" sections in articles about NYC subway stations. On the other hand, your template can be very useful to reference bus routes in contexts outside of subway articles; thus, I don't think that it should have "NYCS" in its name. What do you think? --Larry V (talk | contribs) 02:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
my RfAThanks for your support in my RfA! Unfortunately, the request did not pass, with a vote of (43/16/7). But your support was appreciated and I'll just keep right on doing what I do. Maybe I'll see ya around -- I'll be here!Cheers! - CheNuevara 17:34, 27 July 2006 (UTC) QuestionIs it normal for, for example, band pages to have external links to fan-based websites? Or is that not really appropriate? Thanks. Laura June 20:10, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
BotsThanks for the explanation. Yes, I understand the usefulness and importance of bots. The reason I wrote that was, as you mentioned, I was finding an inordinate number of bot edits on my watchlist, most of which seemed at first glance to be trivial edits. Though large scale edits and cleanups would be impossible without bots. I'm glad to hear there is an approval process for them. Cheers JPotter 21:29, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
AdminshipHey. I read your userpage and it says you'd like to be an admin someday. I have seen you in AFDs and some RFAs and I think you're overdue for adminship. If it's OK with you, I'd like to nominate you for adminship. What do you think? --Tuspm 22:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Jason Earles BirthdayLook at TV.com
Subway InfoboxHey there. I noticed that in the infobox for the 175th Street (IND Eighth Avenue Line) station, under "next south," it identifies the A, but not the C (or the 1, for that matter, but since the 1 is on the IRT B'way line, I wouldn't really expect it). Anyway, being new to the world of templates and such, I don't really see how I can correct this. If you do understand it, could you give me any pointers, etc? Thanks BTW, I put up a picture for the George Washington Bridge Bus Terminal. Really difficult to find a decent angle from the street level. I'm going to keep my eyes and ears open for someone with a high enough window near the terminal. But I suppose the one I took will have to do for now. -Seidenstud 23:40, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replySee my reply here: User_talk:Xaosflux#Deleting_UBXs — xaosflux 01:21, 28 July 2006 (UTC) BotI jsut got in the bag a last night, my orignal comment was out of the bag :) I'll extend the trial on there, but hold off on any more mass edits so there is a change for community input on your bot. — xaosflux 01:45, 28 July 2006 (UTC) Lloyd BanksI happened into this page, I noticed you revereted edits - I think it needs serious fixing or possibly protection by an administrator, the date of his death is still listed as today and has for awhile. There is no current news about this guy on the web, I'm worried that this could be some sort of a hoax but can't keep following it this evening... Sirmob 04:03, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
The bibleThank you for experimenting with the page Bible on Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. αChimp laudare 04:59, 28 July 2006 (UTC) Please refrain from adding nonsense to Misplaced Pages, as you did to Bible. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.
Kudos to the botAlways good to see bots doing the heavy WP:GUS lifting. Cheers. JDoorjam Talk 05:29, 28 July 2006 (UTC) Stop re-editingStop changing the page. Why do you keep editing my changes when I am simply adding valuable, relevant, factual information? Stop or i'll have you banned.
Your penis, so bigCashier: Hello-o? Ey, hello? Randy: Well, how is it good?! We don't understand what the point of your product is!
the vandalism or not botYeah. Thanks for your sincere and illustrious comments on my page. They are actually appreciated and as far as the nitwit vandal thing..no problem. Most of my irritation was aimed at a nasty, but sort of funny, too, accusation that was placed on my page by a real niiwit, at or around the same time. But, in any case, you gave me a laugh and I sorta always like to do that. As far as the Germans solution of userboxes goes, I don't much give a shit what the Germans think about userboxes. As far as the pres goes, well he's the pres, what can I say? I don't personally agree with him and the controlling nature of his decision, but what I think is not a big deal anyway, so who cares? In the end the new official Misplaced Pages environmental userbox is more attractive but it doesn't say what I would like it to say. It says, "This user is interested in environmentalism." If I make my own it will say "This user is an environmentalist." Not exactly the same thing. Anyhow, thanks for taking the time to leave considerate and funny comments on my page. Later. Shannon 15:15, 28 July 2006 (UTC) |