Misplaced Pages

User talk:Renamed user 27zg58al16fzlh17gh: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:38, 6 June 2015 view sourceTAnthony (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors857,216 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Wayward Pines. (TW)← Previous edit Revision as of 23:52, 6 June 2015 view source TAnthony (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors857,216 edits June 2015Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
== June 2015 == == June 2015 ==
] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you made a change to an article, ], but you didn't provide a ]. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to ] and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the ] tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> &mdash; ]<sup>]</sup> 23:38, 6 June 2015 (UTC) ] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you made a change to an article, ], but you didn't provide a ]. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to ] and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the ] tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> &mdash; ]<sup>]</sup> 23:38, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

:You may want to read ] and particularly the section ] if you still don't understand why your logic is incorrect regarding the ''Wayward Pines'' source.&mdash; ]<sup>]</sup> 23:52, 6 June 2015 (UTC)


] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ].

Revision as of 23:52, 6 June 2015

June 2015

Information icon Hello, I'm TAnthony. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Wayward Pines, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — TAnthony 23:38, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

You may want to read WP:OR and particularly the section WP:SYN if you still don't understand why your logic is incorrect regarding the Wayward Pines source.— TAnthony 23:52, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Wayward Pines shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — TAnthony 23:38, 6 June 2015 (UTC)