Revision as of 22:53, 17 June 2015 editDubs boy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users534 edits ←Blanked the page← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:44, 18 June 2015 edit undoScolaire (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers27,739 edits →Talk:Derry: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Talk:Derry == | |||
If it will make you happy. I consider the ] to have failed in the sense that !votes were re-factored in a way that would allow the nominator to later claim that no reason was given for the !votes. In the narrower sense of seeking the answer to a question, it succeeded in showing that there was a majority against change. Please don't push this any farther, it's not achieving anything. ] (]) 17:44, 18 June 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:44, 18 June 2015
Talk:Derry
If it will make you happy. I consider the previous RfC to have failed in the sense that !votes were re-factored in a way that would allow the nominator to later claim that no reason was given for the !votes. In the narrower sense of seeking the answer to a question, it succeeded in showing that there was a majority against change. Please don't push this any farther, it's not achieving anything. Scolaire (talk) 17:44, 18 June 2015 (UTC)