Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 16:56, 25 June 2015

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

This week's article for improvement (week 23, 2015)

The term Buggy is generally used to refer to any lightweight automobile with off road capabilities and sparse bodywork. Hello, Human3015. The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections: Buggy (automobile) Pepperoni Australian Aboriginal sacred sites Paparazzi Atmosphere Previous selections: Types of chocolate • Deep frying • Food industry Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Nominate an article Review nominations Have your say in future selections Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:18, 1 June 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote

• Hello Human3015:

This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 26 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

Those users

You need to know how to use this to deal with those users.

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/India-Pakistan Cosmic  Emperor  10:44, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Well, new uses take time to get used to how things work here. Both of you might need to learn how to give welcome messages (available via WP:TWINKLE). Tell them gently that what they are doing is not proper. If they understand and become productive, well and good. Otherwise, most of them will disappear in course of time. - Kautilya3 (talk) 11:19, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Kautilya3, you can see my contributions I have given welcome messages to many users till now. And CE yes I will watch for it. I'm little bit busy these days. Currently I only do maintainance work of my Watchlist. --Human3015 Say Hey!! • 11:32, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

(edit conflict)Kautilya3 First of all they are not always new users, some are socks. And my comment was not about new users in WP but POV pushers from our peaceful neighbour. People with preconceived bias against a country and religion can't be become open minded through Twinkle message. --Cosmic  Emperor  11:41, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Well, I would leave them to their own devices. Our only concern is the integrity of Misplaced Pages, which is well-protected by our policies. So, let us just educate them about our policies and, if they don't follow, they will disappear one way or another. - Kautilya3 (talk) 11:44, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

You have a new friend. - Kautilya3 (talk) 08:36, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Kautilya3, I have reported that nationalist commando and he has been blocked indefinitely.--Human3015 Call me maybe!! • 08:46, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Kindly create these pages.

Hello. I was following your debates and posts regarding the various synonyms that are used for Kashmir and as to whether those pages are legitimate. I do not have a regular account but am a kind of longtime lurker. I was wondering as to why not that we have pages with identically matching names as those for Kashmir (India's Kashmir i.e.). Could you create the following pages and redirect them to "Azad Kashmir"? Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir, Pakistani-Occupied Kashmir, Pak-Occupied-Kashmir.

Please also consider renaming "Azad Kashmir" to "Pakistan Occupied Kashmir". What I find is that there is NO SUCH NAME available on WIKI. I mean if anything most North-American and European and Asian countries as well as Australia are between "neutral" and leaning to India on Kashmir. Russia (and USSR before), Iraq (under Saddam Hussein), Iran and many other countries, regardless of their color and their religion, back(ed) India on Kashmir.

Eventually my only point is that we should have a reasonable and fair and one-one matching between such pages on both sides. Indian-O-K means Pakistani-O-K should be there. India-O-K == Pakistan-O-K.

I would request you to look into this kindly. Also we could put in material on pak-occupied-Kashmir from :- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/indianews/article-2105531/Kashmiri-activists-seek-Indias-support-save-PoK-Chinas-increasing-strength.html; http://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/indianews/article-3067713/We-silent-invasion-China-Rights-activist-Sering-claims-Gilgit-Baltistan-left-wolves.html. You could look at the Twitter of Senge Hasnan Sering - https://twitter.com/sengehsering - who visited India recently and said that PoK people regardless of religion would join India if there was a plebiscite today. He is of course a Kashmiri from PoK.

India never referred to that area much and the entire focus was on Indian Kashmir (as it is today). This misunderstanding/notion should be removed on WIKI. DM is at least a british daily. We also have references to "pakistan-occupied-Kashmir" once in a while in non-Indian sites. Though "Administered" is what they consistently use for both sides.

Eventually we all know its just semantics. But dirty-faced pakis will always try to push their agenda even in the smallest of ways eve on WIKI. Just wanted to see an equanimity and balance here. Good day. 117.194.250.196 (talk) 14:10, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

"Pakistan-occupied Kashmir" already redirects to Azad Kashmir. So that is not a problem. I agree, however, that there is not enough information about Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan on those pages. So please read some reliable sources and add text to those articles. I also agree that India has done precious little for those provinces despite claiming them to be officially Indian territory, a serious negligence on India's part. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 15:09, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Excuse my dynamic IP. I will edit later and try to improve those articles (will not be possible this week and the next but will do the week following). I think the 2008 UNHR report has been referenced in one of them and some stinky pakis typical of their class were trying to remove that I could see in the R.H. POK is there but you have to actually type out "pakistan occupied Kashmir" in the address-box at the appropriate place to access it. And in that event too we get "autoredirected" to the Azad Kashmir page. Two points - 1) There are several pages like "India Occupied Kashmir" and even "Kashmir Independence Movement" that are showing up in Google searches and leading to a "redirect" (not "autoredirect") to Jammu and Kashmir. BUT even the POK page (the page itself not meaning "Azad Kashmir") does not show up in Google searches and we have to type that out in the address-box. 2) There are like a dozen, maybe a score of links all of which are intrinsically anti-Indian in nature, leading to J&K. They show up in Google and they have "redirect" links to the article which we need to click on. Same does not hold for POK. Only one pages exists at all, it does not show up directly in Google searches due to "autoredirect", and that is just about the only page. Why not have pages like "Pakistan sponsored/backed terrorism" etc and a few more all meaning the same. They should show up in Google searches (I think the "autoredirect" should be removed I guess you get what I mean by "autoredirect"). And there should be multiple pages like that. I am aware of the likes of those pieces of excreta like mar4d and topgun. I have interacted with GB Fan a couple of times, he is American and a good guy but is not aware of the topic, he I believe was acting purely as an Admin when he restored those redirects. Please try to get somebody to do the needful. It felt great yesterday to hear of Indian Army operation that looked like straight out of a Hollywood action movie script. Regards 117.248.137.26 (talk) 07:20, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

References

1. "With Friends like these..." Human Rights Violations in Azad Kashmir, Human Rights Watch, September 2006.
2. Ballard, Roger (2 March 1991). "Kashmir Crisis: View from Mirpur" (PDF). Economic and Political Weekly. 26 (9/10): 513–517. JSTOR 4397403.

This week's article for improvement (week 24, 2015)

An example of sport – a view of the 1906 unofficial Olympic Games Hello, Human3015. The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections: Sport Global cuisine Caramel Arctic Candy apple Previous selections: Buggy (automobile) • Types of chocolate • Deep frying Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Nominate an article Review nominations Have your say in future selections Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:14, 8 June 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote

• Hello Human3015:

This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at Week 27 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

This week's article for improvement (week 25, 2015)

People enjoying the nightlife at a nightclub in Cape Town, South Africa Hello, Human3015. The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections: Nightlife Victoria, Seychelles History of perfume Performing arts Sin Previous selections: Sport • Buggy (automobile) • Types of chocolate Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Nominate an article Review nominations Have your say in future selections Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:13, 15 June 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote

• Hello Human3015:

This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at Week 28 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

Friendly note

Hey random Wikipedian! Notice that our signatures use very similar colors? :) --AmaryllisGardener 02:00, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Ya, its really same, nice to see you. Happy Wikipeding!! --Human3015 Call me maybe!! • 09:46, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Disputed tag

Hey, please don't do this. You need to understand what the disputed tag is meant for. Nothing has been disputed. - Kautilya3 (talk) 19:56, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Instead of removing disputed content from lead and getting involved in edit warring I have added "disputed tag" and took part on talk page. I chose better way instead of edit wars. Now you don't involve in edit war just for that "disputed tag".--Human3015 Call me maybe!! • 19:59, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:33, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

ANI

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.72.10.168.89 (talk) 11:10, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

@72.10.168.89: You have mentioned the section heading as ANI, but the report is on WP:AN not WP:AN/I.--Cosmic  Emperor  11:43, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

कृपया शांत राहणे. अनेक ANI चांगले नाही Cosmic  Emperor  11:39, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Barobar aahe Cosmic Bhau, thats why I'm not much active these days, I have no edits in last 2 days, I'm still busy. But both above two ANIs are senseless and I found that not even necessary to comment there. I have no comments on both ANIs. Its pure useless stunts by other users. --Human3015 Call me maybe!! • 09:20, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Today I found this page Gulf War has only one revert rule. One IP didn't know that and got blocked, as he had no friend to help him. I could have made the same mistake due to inexperience. There are lots of very clever bad faith editors who behave very nicely and politely to push POV. They don't edit war, they don't break the 3-revert rule or make personal attack. One has to be very careful to deal with them. --Cosmic  Emperor  11:25, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 26, 2015)

The amounts of fat types in selected foods Hello, Human3015. The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections: Fat Geographical pole Adult Cereal Chicken sandwich History of pharmacy Previous selections: Nightlife • Sport • Buggy (automobile) Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Nominate an article Review nominations Have your say in future selections Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:07, 22 June 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote

• Hello Human3015:

This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at Week 29 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

Please use this version on Siachen Glacier

Please use this version version for the Siachen Glacier. its suitable according to other Glaciers template--Koodfaand (talk) 20:48, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

This version is also good but "antagonist" people would have "protested" more strongly after seeing "Indian flagicon" in infobox so I restored earlier version. --Human3015 Call me maybe!! • 20:56, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Those "antagonist" people should see other pages where flagicon has been used. Also this version of page is according to other Glacier templates like Baltoro Glacier and Brüggen Glacier--Koodfaand (talk) 20:59, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Yes, but your given versions also don't show flagicon of that nation.--Human3015 Call me maybe!! • 21:09, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Human3015, I have seen other pages like Beijing, Tokyo, etc, you can keep this version of page by just removing flagicon --Koodfaand (talk) 21:14, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Page has been protected already, you should request to any admin to make your change, I'm not admin but I can help you for that request. Or you can wait for 7 days by then page will be unprotected automatically, till then you can discuss it on talk. --Human3015 Call me maybe!! • 21:18, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Your edit on Rahim Yar Khan

Hello. I saw your revert on the article and liked your edit summary, it was someone who was proud of his home town who had written it. I noticed the edit earlier but just couldn't revert it, even though I know that I should have, but it's nice to be reminded that we're dealing with human beings. Keep up the good work. /Tom Thomas.W 23:41, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Yes, such things do happen, many times me too don't revert many unsourced "emotional" edits. Many times I think that "let the other users revert it, I will not revert it". Well, thanks for your appreciation. --Human3015 Call me maybe!! • 00:01, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Three cheers to Humanity! Nice going guys! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 07:34, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Cheers. Faizan (talk) 14:59, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Reason for IP block

If you click edit, you can see the full reason in the block log. In this case it was block evasion of which was in turn block evading. We've had a problem with these "Hackney library" IP's for a while. --NeilN 16:20, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Ok, fine. I didn't know that. --Human3015 Call me maybe!! • 16:23, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

P.S. If you want me explain why a couple of your AIV reports resulted in no action, point them out and I will try to do so. --NeilN 16:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

I will not specify any case, but I see various reports on AIV by other users too, some admins including you act very "mercifully" or you "forgive very easily" while some admins block those kind of vandals very quickly, there maybe some "admin bias of perception of problem". Thats why today I shocked when you blocked that IP who done only one edit, but thanks for your elaboration. But still for example I was reported this IP. --Human3015 Call me maybe!! • 16:56, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

That IP edited once, got two warnings for it, and then stopped so they wouldn't have been blocked. And you're right, some admins are pretty quick to block. In cases of block evasion that's fine, but in other cases, blocks are supposed to be issued to prevent future disruption. So if someone adds "I love Becky" to an article a few times and then stops, it's unlikely they'll be blocked. --NeilN 17:14, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Friendly advice

I'm honored. Will try and find time to go through the procedure in the future. --BoogaLouie (talk) 22:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

On Reverting prior to Talk

Please refrain from injustified reverting of edit on the page Popular Front of India. Changges are welcome ofcourse, however reverting edits backed up by valid WP sources results in NPOV.I had thought that they would be atleast a "talk" before such reverts Huhshyeh (talk)Huhshyeh

Speaking of socks

Zmaghndstakun is a sock of tripwire, created to save him going over 3rr again, and tripwire is probably a sock of Highstakes001 31.49.253.103 (talk) 10:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

31.49.253.103, Ok I will look for it, thanks for sharing, user Zmaghndstakun is seem like sock puppet, I may open an investigation for it. And you should write correct spelling of Highstakes001 because I'm not finding any user of that name. And I will request TopGun who reverted this edit two times to help me in this issue to finding out probable sock puppets because just yesterday you said on User talk:TopGun#A barnstar for you! that you will help in finding out sock puppets of "all" nations. And above IP is sock puppet or not is not confirmed yet, if this IP is sock then he/she will also get blocked. --Human3015 Call me maybe!! • 16:56, 25 June 2015 (UTC)