Misplaced Pages

User talk:TopGun: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:17, 3 July 2015 editFuture Perfect at Sunrise (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators87,199 editsm Reverted edits by 2605:6000:640C:DB00:3531:F78A:AE5D:EBEB (talk) to last version by Future Perfect at Sunrise← Previous edit Revision as of 18:11, 3 July 2015 edit undoTopGun (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers20,007 edits Topic-banned: rNext edit →
Line 152: Line 152:


I just noticed this edit of yours. If you seriously thought the version you were reinstating was better than the other, I can only conclude you utterly lack the ] to act responsibly as a Misplaced Pages editor in a POV-sensitive topic area. Consequently, I am '''topic-banning''' you from all edits related to Indian-Pakistani conflicts and Pakistani politics for a period of '''6 months'''. I assume you know the procedure about logging and appeals of such DS measures. ] ] 14:41, 3 July 2015 (UTC) I just noticed this edit of yours. If you seriously thought the version you were reinstating was better than the other, I can only conclude you utterly lack the ] to act responsibly as a Misplaced Pages editor in a POV-sensitive topic area. Consequently, I am '''topic-banning''' you from all edits related to Indian-Pakistani conflicts and Pakistani politics for a period of '''6 months'''. I assume you know the procedure about logging and appeals of such DS measures. ] ] 14:41, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
:Huh?!?! {{u|Future Perfect at Sunrise}}, I made a revert keeping the word "Invaded" out to an ''obvious'' SPA in a sock infested topic area who I noticed on a talk page. I did not care about the version that was previously there as well. How come that lone edit is worth a topic ban? This fact is corroborated by my complete silence at . I didn't care for either version. Even if this was something I had personally added to the article, this was mostly the case on Kashmir dispute (Muslim majority and a Hindu ruler). I don't see how it is OR. It was only preferable to the word invaded. You need to rethink over this or I'll be happy to take this to ]. --<span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">] (])</span> 18:11, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:11, 3 July 2015


Archiving icon
Archives

Manual archives:

Semi-automatic (filtered) archives:

Automatic archives:


Archives (Index)



This page is archived by ClueBot III.


This page has archives. Sections older than 4166.5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III.
Beware! This user's talk page is patrolled by talk page stalkers.




Please create new sections at the bottom of the page.

If we were already talking on this page but the conversation is gone:
you'll find our conversation in one of the archives unless you were rude. You can revive it by creating a new discussion here and linking it to the archive and you can even move it back with attribution in edit summaries with a civil note (if you're comfortable with wiki markup).

If I have left you a message on your talk page, you can reply there, but remember to add a {{tb|replace this with your username|ts=~~~~~}} template to my talk page because I might not be watchlisting your talkpage if we don't interact regularly. I will do the same for you if you ask me to or if you have not recently commented on my talkpage in the discussion.

Note that it is 11:09 AM (+5 UTC), where I live.
Chess, everyone!

Make a move...
View current game

TopGun vs. World
Chessboard Moves
abcdefgh
8f8 black rookc7 white rookf7 white bishopd6 black pawnf6 black kingh6 black pawna5 black pawnb5 black pawnf5 black pawng5 black pawnd4 white knightb3 white pawnd3 white pawng3 white pawna2 white pawne2 white pawnf2 white pawnh2 white pawng1 white king8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
TopGun to move...
# TopGun World
1 b3 Nf6
2 g3 g6
3 Bb2 Bg7
4 Bg2 c6
5 Na3 Qa5
6 Nc4 Qc7
7 d3 b5
8 Nd2 Qa5
9 Nh3 Bb7
10 O-O Bh6
11 Ne4 Bg7
12 Qd2 Qxd2
13 Nxd2 Na6
14 Rfc1 Nc5
15 c4 Bf8
16 xb5 Rc8
17 Rxc5 xb5
18 Rxc8+ Bxc8
19 Ne4 Bg7
20 Nxf6+ xf6
21 Rc1 O-O
22 Rc5 a6
23 Bd5 d6
24 Rc7 h6
25 Nf4 g5
26 Ng6 Rd8
27 Ne7+ Kh7
28 Nxc8 f5
29 Bxg7 Kxg7
30 Ne7 Kf6
31 Nc6 Re8
32 Nd4 Rf8
33 Nc6 Kg6
34 Bxf7 a5



Picture of the day Tocopilla railway The Tocopilla railway was a mountain railway built to serve the sodium nitrate mines in the Toco area of the Antofagasta Region in Chile. With a gauge of 3 ft 6 in (1,067 mm), it ran from the port of Tocopilla on the Pacific coast up to a height of 4,902 feet (1,494 metres), with gradients up to 1 in 24. The railway was built by a joint-stock company founded in London and was designed by William Stirling of Lima, with a detailed description of the initial operation of the railway published by his brother Robert in 1900.The line was electrified in the mid-1920s and expanded in 1930 with the addition of lines serving new areas of mining. It continued operating into the 21st century, but was forced to close in 2015 when flash flooding caused numerous washouts on the electrified section of the railroad. With the declining prospects for nitrate, it was not economical for the line to be repaired. This photograph taken in 2013 shows a boxcab on the Tocopilla railway, leading a train down towards the coast.Photograph credit: David Gubler ArchiveMore featured pictures...

The Bugle: Issue CXI, June 2015

Full front page of The Bugle Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
"The Defender of the Wiki is awarded to those who have gone above and beyond to prevent Misplaced Pages from being used for fraudulent purposes."

For exposing and shutting down another sock farm of Darkness Shines. Faizan (talk) 19:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! He had it coming. Cheers. --lTopGunl (talk) 19:08, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
You sir are awesome! You are being awarded this barnstar for detecting, countering and then nuking the socks who have been disrupting Misplaced Pages by pushing POVs. Thanks for keeping Misplaced Pages clean! —TripWire  20:17, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, TripWire! Much appreciated. Best of luck with the recreation of your article without a sock hounding you this time. Please try to rewrite the text to avoid copyright issues; even in your userspace. --lTopGunl (talk) 20:23, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
We hope that TopGun sir will also expose sock puppets of nationalist POV users of "all" countries. Cheers. --Human3015 Call me maybe!! • 20:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
I have been at it and an example would be that of User:Lagoo Saab from Islamabad, Pakistan. But I'll ofcourse consider your comment as banter, on a lighter note, rather than divisive. --lTopGunl (talk) 20:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Murder, She Wrote episodes

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Murder, She Wrote episodes. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jimi Hendrix

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jimi Hendrix. Legobot (talk) 00:09, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tyson Fury

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tyson Fury. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

--Tag Teaming (talk) 04:15, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Note I have removed this section from ANI due to it being posted through the inappropriate use of an alternate account. Whoever "Tag Teaming" is can use their regular account to make such posts. Chillum 04:27, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Topic-banned

I just noticed this edit of yours. If you seriously thought the version you were reinstating was better than the other, I can only conclude you utterly lack the competence to act responsibly as a Misplaced Pages editor in a POV-sensitive topic area. Consequently, I am topic-banning you from all edits related to Indian-Pakistani conflicts and Pakistani politics for a period of 6 months. I assume you know the procedure about logging and appeals of such DS measures. Fut.Perf. 14:41, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Huh?!?! Future Perfect at Sunrise, I made a revert keeping the word "Invaded" out to an obvious SPA in a sock infested topic area who I noticed on a talk page. I did not care about the version that was previously there as well. How come that lone edit is worth a topic ban? This fact is corroborated by my complete silence at this. I didn't care for either version. Even if this was something I had personally added to the article, this was mostly the case on Kashmir dispute (Muslim majority and a Hindu ruler). I don't see how it is OR. It was only preferable to the word invaded. You need to rethink over this or I'll be happy to take this to WP:AE. --lTopGunl (talk) 18:11, 3 July 2015 (UTC)