| Revision as of 21:47, 3 July 2015 editFuture Perfect at Sunrise (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators87,199 edits →Indo-Pak articles: mind those topic bans← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:36, 4 July 2015 edit undoHuman3015 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,614 edits archived talk pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{Archive box|auto=yes|search=yes}} | {{Archive box|auto=yes|search=yes}} | ||
| == Today's articles for improvement weekly vote == | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello Human3015 | |||
| The small changes I made to Karachi were not test. Would appreciate if you would put back the changes. Thx -Akahddlo <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 23:43, 28 June 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| * Hello Human3015: | |||
| :This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at ''']'''. Thanks for participating! | |||
| <small><center>Sent by ] using ] on 05:47, 1 June 2015 (UTC)</center></small> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Northamerica1000@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Today%27s_articles_for_improvement/Members/Notifications&oldid=664960103 --> | |||
| == Those users == | |||
| You need to know how to use this to deal with those users. | |||
| https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/India-Pakistan <span style="border:1px solid #0072BC;padding:1px;">] ]</span> 10:44, 5 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| : Well, new uses take time to get used to how things work here. Both of you might need to learn how to give welcome messages (available via ]). Tell them gently that what they are doing is not proper. If they understand and become productive, well and good. Otherwise, most of them will disappear in course of time. - ] (]) 11:19, 5 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::{{u|Kautilya3}}, you can see my contributions I have given welcome messages to many users till now. And CE yes I will watch for it. I'm little bit busy these days. Currently I only do maintainance work of my Watchlist. --]] • 11:32, 5 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{ec}}{{u|Kautilya3}} First of all they are not always new users, some are socks. And my comment was not about new users in WP but POV pushers from our peaceful neighbour. People with preconceived bias against a country and religion can't be become open minded through Twinkle message. --<span style="border:1px solid #0072BC;padding:1px;">] ]</span> 11:41, 5 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Well, I would leave them to their own devices. Our only concern is the integrity of Misplaced Pages, which is well-protected by our policies. So, let us just educate them about our policies and, if they don't follow, they will disappear one way or another. - ] (]) 11:44, 5 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: You have a new . - ] (]) 08:36, 12 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::{{u|Kautilya3}}, I have reported that nationalist commando and he has been blocked indefinitely.--]] • 08:46, 12 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Kindly create these pages. == | |||
| Hello. I was following your debates and posts regarding the various synonyms that are used for Kashmir and as to whether those pages are legitimate. I do not have a regular account but am a kind of longtime lurker. I was wondering as to why not that we have pages with identically matching names as those for Kashmir (India's Kashmir i.e.). Could you create the following pages and redirect them to "Azad Kashmir"? Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir, Pakistani-Occupied Kashmir, | |||
| Pak-Occupied-Kashmir. | |||
| Please also consider renaming "Azad Kashmir" to "Pakistan Occupied Kashmir". What I find is that there is NO SUCH NAME available on WIKI. I mean if anything most North-American and European and Asian countries as well as Australia are between "neutral" and leaning to India on Kashmir. Russia (and USSR before), Iraq (under Saddam Hussein), Iran and many other countries, regardless of their color and their religion, back(ed) India on Kashmir. | |||
| Eventually my only point is that we should have a reasonable and fair and one-one matching between such pages on both sides. Indian-O-K means Pakistani-O-K should be there. India-O-K == Pakistan-O-K. | |||
| I would request you to look into this kindly. Also we could put in material on pak-occupied-Kashmir from :- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/indianews/article-2105531/Kashmiri-activists-seek-Indias-support-save-PoK-Chinas-increasing-strength.html; http://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/indianews/article-3067713/We-silent-invasion-China-Rights-activist-Sering-claims-Gilgit-Baltistan-left-wolves.html. You could look at the Twitter of Senge Hasnan Sering - https://twitter.com/sengehsering - who visited India recently and said that PoK people regardless of religion would join India if there was a plebiscite today. He is of course a Kashmiri from PoK. | |||
| India never referred to that area much and the entire focus was on Indian Kashmir (as it is today). This misunderstanding/notion should be removed on WIKI. DM is at least a british daily. We also have references to "pakistan-occupied-Kashmir" once in a while in non-Indian sites. Though "Administered" is what they consistently use for both sides. | |||
| Eventually we all know its just semantics. But dirty-faced pakis will always try to push their agenda even in the smallest of ways eve on WIKI. Just wanted to see an equanimity and balance here. Good day. ] (]) 14:10, 7 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| : "Pakistan-occupied Kashmir" already redirects to ]. So that is not a problem. I agree, however, that there is not enough information about Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan on those pages. So please read some reliable sources and add text to those articles.<ref>, Human Rights Watch, September 2006.</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=Kashmir Crisis: View from Mirpur |first=Roger |last=Ballard |url=http://casas.org.uk/papers/pdfpapers/kashmir.pdf |journal=] |volume=26 |number=9/10 |date= 2 March 1991 |pp=513-517 |JSTOR=4397403}}</ref> I also agree that India has done precious little for those provinces despite claiming them to be officially Indian territory, a serious negligence on India's part. Cheers, ] (]) 15:09, 7 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :: Excuse my dynamic IP. I will edit later and try to improve those articles (will not be possible this week and the next but will do the week following). I think the 2008 UNHR report has been referenced in one of them and some stinky pakis typical of their class were trying to remove that I could see in the R.H. POK is there but you have to actually type out "pakistan occupied Kashmir" in the address-box at the appropriate place to access it. And in that event too we get "autoredirected" to the Azad Kashmir page. Two points - 1) There are several pages like "India Occupied Kashmir" and even "Kashmir Independence Movement" that are showing up in Google searches and leading to a "redirect" (not "autoredirect") to Jammu and Kashmir. BUT even the POK page (the page itself not meaning "Azad Kashmir") does not show up in Google searches and we have to type that out in the address-box. 2) There are like a dozen, maybe a score of links all of which are intrinsically anti-Indian in nature, leading to J&K. They show up in Google and they have "redirect" links to the article which '''we need to click on'''. Same does not hold for POK. Only one pages exists at all, due to "autoredirect", and that is just about the only page. Why not have pages like "Pakistan sponsored/backed terrorism" etc and a few more all meaning the same. They should show up in Google searches (I think the "autoredirect" should be removed I guess you get what I mean by "autoredirect"). And there should be multiple pages like that. I am aware of the likes of those pieces of excreta like mar4d and topgun. I have interacted with GB Fan a couple of times, he is American and a good guy but is not aware of the topic, he I believe was acting purely as an Admin when he restored those redirects. Please try to get somebody to do the needful. It felt great yesterday to hear of Indian Army operation that looked like straight out of a Hollywood action movie script. Regards ] (]) 07:20, 10 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| {{reflist-talk}} | |||
| == This week's ] (week 24, 2015) == | |||
| {| style="width:100%; padding:2px;" | |||
| ! <div style="margin:0; background-color:#E2E7FF; border:1px solid blue; text-align:center; color:#082840; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.4em; padding-bottom: 0.4em; padding-right: 0.4em; font-weight:normal">{{TAFI/Picture box|week=2015/24}} '''Hello, Human3015.''' | |||
| The following are WikiProject ]'s weekly selections: | |||
| <span style="font-size:110%; font-weight:bold;">{{Plainlist| | |||
| *{{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/24/1}} | |||
| *{{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/24/2}} | |||
| *{{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/24/3}} | |||
| *{{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/24/4}} | |||
| *{{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/24/5}} | |||
| }}</span> | |||
| ---- | |||
| Previous selections: {{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/23/1}} • {{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/22/1}} • {{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/21/1}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... {{Plainlist| | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *]}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| <small>Posted by: {{User0|EuroCarGT}} 00:14, 8 June 2015 (UTC) using ] (]) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • {{edit|Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/Members/Notifications|Opt-out instructions}}</small></div> | |||
| |}<!-- Substituted from Template:TAFI five weekly selections notice --> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:EuroCarGT@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Today%27s_articles_for_improvement/Members/Notifications&oldid=665485622 --> | |||
| == Today's articles for improvement weekly vote == | |||
| ] | |||
| * Hello Human3015: | |||
| :This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at ''']'''. Thanks for participating! | |||
| <small><center>Sent by ] using ] on 05:04, 9 June 2015 (UTC)</center></small> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Northamerica1000@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Today%27s_articles_for_improvement/Members/Notifications&oldid=665485622 --> | |||
| == This week's ] (week 25, 2015) == | |||
| {| style="width:100%; padding:2px;" | |||
| ! <div style="margin:0; background-color:#E2E7FF; border:1px solid blue; text-align:center; color:#082840; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.4em; padding-bottom: 0.4em; padding-right: 0.4em; font-weight:normal">{{TAFI/Picture box|week=2015/25}} '''Hello, Human3015.''' | |||
| The following are WikiProject ]'s weekly selections: | |||
| <span style="font-size:110%; font-weight:bold;">{{Plainlist| | |||
| *{{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/25/1}} | |||
| *{{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/25/2}} | |||
| *{{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/25/3}} | |||
| *{{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/25/4}} | |||
| *{{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/25/5}} | |||
| }}</span> | |||
| ---- | |||
| Previous selections: {{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/24/1}} • {{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/23/1}} • {{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/22/1}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... {{Plainlist| | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *]}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| <small>Posted by: {{User0|EuroCarGT}} 00:13, 15 June 2015 (UTC) using ] (]) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • {{edit|Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/Members/Notifications|Opt-out instructions}}</small></div> | |||
| |}<!-- Substituted from Template:TAFI five weekly selections notice --> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:EuroCarGT@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Today%27s_articles_for_improvement/Members/Notifications&oldid=666647979 --> | |||
| == Today's articles for improvement weekly vote == | |||
| ] | |||
| * Hello Human3015: | |||
| :This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at ''']'''. Thanks for participating! | |||
| <small><center>Sent by ] using ] on 20:47, 16 June 2015 (UTC)</center></small> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Northamerica1000@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Today%27s_articles_for_improvement/Members/Notifications&oldid=667218478 --> | |||
| == Friendly note == | |||
| Hey random Wikipedian! Notice that our signatures use very similar colors? :) --] <sup>]</sup> 02:00, 18 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Ya, its really same, nice to see you. Happy Wikipeding!! {{smiley}} --]] • 09:46, 18 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Disputed tag == | |||
| Hey, please don't do this. You need to understand what the disputed tag is meant for. Nothing has been disputed. - ] (]) 19:56, 18 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Instead of removing disputed content from lead and getting involved in edit warring I have added "disputed tag" and took part on talk page. I chose better way instead of edit wars. Now you don't involve in edit war just for that "disputed tag".--]] • 19:59, 18 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == ANI == | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. -- ] (]) 21:33, 18 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == ANI == | |||
| ] This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:AN-notice-->] (]) 11:10, 20 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :: {{ping|72.10.168.89}} You have mentioned the section heading as ANI, but the report is on ] not ].--<span style="border:1px solid #0072BC;padding:1px;">] ]</span> 11:43, 20 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == A cheeseburger for you! == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | कृपया शांत राहणे. अनेक ANI चांगले नाही <span style="border:1px solid #0072BC;padding:1px;">] ]</span> 11:39, 20 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| :Barobar aahe Cosmic Bhau, thats why I'm not much active these days, I have no edits in last 2 days, I'm still busy. But both above two ANIs are senseless and I found that not even necessary to comment there. I have no comments on both ANIs. Its pure useless stunts by other users. --]] • 09:20, 22 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :: Today I found this page ] has only . One IP didn't know that and got blocked, as . I could have made the same mistake due to inexperience. There are lots of very clever bad faith editors who behave very nicely and politely to push POV. They don't edit war, they don't break the 3-revert rule or make personal attack. ] --<span style="border:1px solid #0072BC;padding:1px;">] ]</span> 11:25, 22 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == This week's ] (week 26, 2015) == | |||
| {| style="width:100%; padding:2px;" | |||
| ! <div style="margin:0; background-color:#E2E7FF; border:1px solid blue; text-align:center; color:#082840; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.4em; padding-bottom: 0.4em; padding-right: 0.4em; font-weight:normal">{{TAFI/Picture box|week=2015/26}} '''Hello, Human3015.''' | |||
| The following are WikiProject ]'s weekly selections: | |||
| <span style="font-size:110%; font-weight:bold;">{{Plainlist| | |||
| *{{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/26/1}} | |||
| *{{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/26/2}} | |||
| *{{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/26/3}} | |||
| *{{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/26/4}} | |||
| *{{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/26/5}} | |||
| *{{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/26/6}} | |||
| }}</span> | |||
| ---- | |||
| Previous selections: {{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/25/1}} • {{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/24/1}} • {{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/23/1}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... {{Plainlist| | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *]}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| <small>Posted by: {{User0|EuroCarGT}} 00:07, 22 June 2015 (UTC) using ] (]) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • {{edit|Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/Members/Notifications|Opt-out instructions}}</small></div> | |||
| |}<!-- Substituted from Template:TAFI five weekly selections notice --> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:EuroCarGT@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Today%27s_articles_for_improvement/Members/Notifications&oldid=667732169 --> | |||
| == Today's articles for improvement weekly vote == | |||
| ] | |||
| * Hello Human3015: | |||
| :This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at ''']'''. Thanks for participating! | |||
| <small><center>Sent by ] using ] on 00:47, 22 June 2015 (UTC)</center></small> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Northamerica1000@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Today%27s_articles_for_improvement/Members/Notifications&oldid=667732169 --> | |||
| == Please use this version on Siachen Glacier == | |||
| Please use this version for the Siachen Glacier. its suitable according to other Glaciers template--] (]) 20:48, 22 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :This version is also good but "antagonist" people would have "protested" more strongly after seeing "Indian flagicon" in infobox so I restored earlier version. --]] • 20:56, 22 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Those "antagonist" people should see other pages where flagicon has been used. Also this of page is according to other Glacier templates like ] and ]--] (]) 20:59, 22 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Yes, but your given versions also don't show flagicon of that nation.--]] • 21:09, 22 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::: {{u|Human3015}}, I have seen other pages like ], ], etc, you can keep this of page by just removing flagicon --] (]) 21:14, 22 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Page has been protected already, you should request to any admin to make your change, I'm not admin but I can help you for that request. Or you can wait for 7 days by then page will be unprotected automatically, till then you can discuss it on talk. --]] • 21:18, 22 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Your edit on ] == | |||
| Hello. I saw your revert on the article and liked your edit summary, it was someone who was proud of his home town who had written it. I noticed the edit earlier but just couldn't revert it, even though I know that I should have, but it's nice to be reminded that we're dealing with human beings. Keep up the good work. /Tom ] ] 23:41, 22 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes, such things do happen, many times me too don't revert many unsourced "emotional" edits. Many times I think that "let the other users revert it, I will not revert it". Well, thanks for your appreciation. --]] • 00:01, 23 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :: Three cheers to Humanity! Nice going guys! -- ] (]) 07:34, 23 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Cheers. ] (]) 14:59, 23 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Reason for IP block == | |||
| If you click edit, you can see the full reason in the block log. In this case it was block evasion of which was in turn block evading. We've had a problem with these "Hackney library" IP's for a while. --] <sup>]</sup> 16:20, 24 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| : Ok, fine. I didn't know that. --]] • 16:23, 24 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::P.S. If you want me explain why a couple of your AIV reports resulted in no action, point them out and I will try to do so. --] <sup>]</sup> 16:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::I will not specify any case, but I see various reports on AIV by other users too, some admins including you act very "mercifully" or you "forgive very easily" while some admins block those kind of vandals very quickly, there maybe some "admin bias of perception of problem". Thats why today I shocked when you blocked that IP who done only one edit, but thanks for your elaboration. But still for example I was reported . --]] • 16:56, 24 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::That IP edited once, got two warnings for it, and then stopped so they wouldn't have been blocked. And you're right, some admins are pretty quick to block. In cases of block evasion that's fine, but in other cases, blocks are supposed to be issued to prevent ''future'' disruption. So if someone adds "I love Becky" to an article a few times and then stops, it's unlikely they'll be blocked. --] <sup>]</sup> 17:14, 24 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Friendly advice == | |||
| I'm honored. Will try and find time to go through the procedure in the future. --] (]) 22:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == On Reverting prior to Talk == | |||
| Please refrain from injustified reverting of edit on the page ]. Changges are welcome ofcourse, however reverting edits backed up by valid WP sources results in NPOV.I had thought that they would be atleast a "talk" before such reverts ] (])Huhshyeh | |||
| This is would be your 2nd NPOV on the same day. Urge you to read the reasons for edit and then act. ] (]) | |||
| == Balochistan province kerfluffle == | |||
| Hello Human, | |||
| Any advice on the correct/proper/best way to proceed on adding information to the article? Cyphoidbomb has ] some wikiprojects. | |||
| Should we Wait for the RfC to close? Request formal mediation? Thanks in advance for any suggestions --] (]) 16:53, 26 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == CosmicEmperor == | |||
| I didn't realize he got blocked. What did he do? -- ] (]) 22:31, 26 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :He was firstly blocked for "harassing" and "abusing", I didn't search or don't know where he harassed someone or abused. Later another admin changed his block setting to "FOR using multiple accounts", where Cosmic claimed he use shared IP in hostel. But 3 accounts that one CheckUser mentioned on Cosmic's talk page as his "socks" or "another accounts" seem to be not related to Cosmic, if you see contributions of those mentioned users they are no where related to Cosmic's area of interest, maybe they used same IP.--]] • 22:37, 26 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::{{u|Kautilya3}}, , , these are the 3 accounts, CheckUser mentioned it as "another accounts" of Cosmic. You can see contributions of these users, they may have used same PC or IP but these accounts are surely not related to Cosmic. These users never edit any India-Pakistan-Bangladesh dispute related article. At least these accounts are not used in edit warring or in RfC by Cosmic. --]] • 22:57, 26 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. This is regarding your unsupported reverts, NPOVs and unwarranted self-dicredition of four alternate media sources <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 07:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == This week's ] (week 27, 2015) == | |||
| {| style="width:100%; padding:2px;" | |||
| ! <div style="margin:0; background-color:#E2E7FF; border:1px solid blue; text-align:center; color:#082840; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.4em; padding-bottom: 0.4em; padding-right: 0.4em; font-weight:normal">{{TAFI/Picture box|week=2015/27}} '''Hello, Human3015.''' | |||
| The following are WikiProject ]'s weekly selections: | |||
| <span style="font-size:110%; font-weight:bold;">{{Plainlist| | |||
| *{{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/27/1}} | |||
| *{{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/27/2}} | |||
| *{{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/27/3}} | |||
| *{{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/27/4}} | |||
| *{{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/27/5}} | |||
| }}</span> | |||
| ---- | |||
| Previous selections: {{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/26/1}} • {{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/25/1}} • {{Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/2015/24/1}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... {{Plainlist| | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *]}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| <small>Posted by: {{User0|EuroCarGT}} 00:07, 29 June 2015 (UTC) using ] (]) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • {{edit|Misplaced Pages:Today's articles for improvement/Members/Notifications|Opt-out instructions}}</small></div> | |||
| |}<!-- Substituted from Template:TAFI five weekly selections notice --> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:EuroCarGT@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Today%27s_articles_for_improvement/Members/Notifications&oldid=668883257 --> | |||
| == Today's articles for improvement weekly vote == | |||
| ] | |||
| * Hello Human3015: | |||
| :This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at ''']'''. Thanks for participating! | |||
| <small><center>Sent by ] using ] on 02:24, 29 June 2015 (UTC)</center></small> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Northamerica1000@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Today%27s_articles_for_improvement/Members/Notifications&oldid=668883257 --> | |||
| == Kashmir conflict DRN == | |||
| Hi Humanist, can you please stop trivialising the DRN issue? Kashmir conflict is definitely not something to be taken lightly, which is precisely why Steven Zhang is handling it personally. Also, please don't bring up issues of editing behviour at DRN, which is purely meant for resolving, or helping to resolve, content disputes. All you need to do is to state your position precisely, and wait for the moderator's guidance. Cheers, ] (]) 09:24, 29 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == South Glasgow University Hospital article == | |||
| Hi there, I've edited the article based on your tags and wonder what your opinion/feedback is on the changed made over at ]. | |||
| Thanks. | |||
| :{{u|MrGRA}}, thats fine, you can remove the tags. Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. --]] • 13:51, 29 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Please be careful of ]. --] <sup>]</sup> 20:57, 29 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes, I know about it, but I have made just two reverts, all names there are staring with "Hu" thats why you may had confusion that I'm on 3RR. Still thanks for caution. --]] • 21:02, 29 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Caste system in India revert == | |||
| Human3015, This revert is highly improper. You claim to be doing this as part of a "]". However, recent changes patrol is meant for looking out for "inappropriate edits." By no means was mine an inappropriate edit. You have really raised a deep content dispute, but without knowing practically anything about the subject, without reading the source, and without understanding the reason it has been removed. Your talk page discussion at ] is highly unsatisfactory. I am pinging {{U|NeilN}} so that he can advise you how to do "recent changes patrol" properly. | |||
| If you want to participate in the ongoing revamp of the ], you are entirely welcome to do so. But you would need to raise and discuss the issues that are being debated, understand the issues with the article, the literature, and how a bunch of us are trying to hard to balance various viewpoints and represent them all fairly. {{U|Sitush}} has done a great clean-up job of one section today, and he left out a couple of issues (Beteille and Basham quotes) which were hard to deal with. I know that the Beteille quote wasn't necessary, so I removed it. And, I have raised the Basham quote issue on the talk page. But that is an ongoing discussion. You are welcome to participate. But, with your drive-by reverts, you are just being disruptive. So, please back off. There are enough of us who care deeply about the subject and we are working on it. We don't need your help in protecting anything. | |||
| Best regard, ] (]) 18:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :{{u|Kautilya3}}, we were discussing it on talk page so there was no issue to bring it to my talk page, still, you have no authority to decide wether I have knowledge of subject or not. If I say you don't have any knowledge regarding this subject then will you accept it?? And you are saying you don't need me on that page because you have enough nice editors for clean up on that article, I wonder how an editor like you can say that? every user of Misplaced Pages has same right over all articles of Misplaced Pages. You really can't restrict me from editing that article. Better you discuss this issue on talk page of the article. And your statement ''But, with your drive-by reverts, you are just being disruptive.'' is completely false, I just made one revert and you lost your tempo. And regarding my earlier adding of "dispute" tag ther, you just check edit history of article even admin added same dispute tag to article later which you reverted. Well I don't think I should give explanation to you. --]] • 18:46, 1 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :: Well, I don't know whether you have knowledge of the subject or not. But I do know that you haven't been exhibited any such knowledge in the talk page discussion. Even on this revert, I asked two straight questions, which you haven't answered after 10 rounds of to-and-fro. This doesn't bode well. Regarding the "disputed" tag on which you edit-warred, let me remind you that I took it to ANI, you neglected to participate, and the other editor was asked to remove it by the admins. So, your edit-warring on the "disputed" was wrong, as per the decision of the admins. So, I am sorry, your participation is extremely superficial and disruptive. There is no other way to describe it. - ] (]) 18:57, 1 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::really? Our dispute tag issue was of 19th June , you reverted my dispute tag, that page was deserving dispute tag, but you reverted it as probably you own some articles, but same dispute tag was added by admin on 25th June later long after ANI discussion was over, which proves that article was deserving that tag for that moment, but you reverted it. --]] • 19:07, 1 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Once again, you are displaying your superficiality. The tag you added was <nowiki>{{disputed}}</nowiki>. The tag added by the admin is <nowiki>{{pp-dispute}}</nowiki>. You apparently have no idea what the difference is. But I took the issue to ANI . Why didn't you participate if you believed that your behaviour was correct? - ] (]) 19:19, 1 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I didn't participate because you reported me in more like excitement, you made a non-issue into a big issue. Adding dispute tag was not a big deal which later added by admin. Both "dispute" and "pp-dispute" tags means content in article is disputed. Anyway, I didn't participate in ANI in which you reported me and I don't even got any notice from any admin regarding my addition "dispute" tag. I didn't participate because I knew another admin himself will add dispute tag to article, and he did. --]] • 20:07, 1 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| {{od}} | |||
| I know that you are a humanist, but ancient sayings pack tons of wisdom. So here it goes: | |||
| vidyA dadAti vinayaM, vinayAdyAti pAtratAM । | |||
| pAtratvAddhanamApnoti, dhanAddharmaM tataH sukhaM ।। | |||
| Knowledge gives you humility. Humility gives rise to competence. From competence you acquire wealth (or success). Through wealth, you practice ''dharma'' and that leads to happiness. | |||
| I don't know about the last bits, but the first two lines about knowledge, humility and competence are certainly true. Cheers, ] (]) 10:26, 3 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==Help== | |||
| Dear Human3015 Sir, Can u please tell me how many citations are necessary for ] city to get a good article status. Other editors have advised me but u r related to wikiproject maharashtra and are frequently active so asking u | |||
| ] (]) 09:08, 2 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :{{u|Dongar Kathorekar}}, its not about number of citations, even one reliable citation is enough for each written things. You can read guidelines on ] regarding and what to write in it. --]] • 09:31, 2 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :{{u|Dongar Kathorekar}}, ] also has many red links in it. There should not be any red link in good article, either you make articles on those red links or you remove link from it and keep it simple. I will help you on this issue. Rest of discussion if needed we will continue on talk page of ]. It will be a good article. --]] • 09:41, 2 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Ok Sir. We can initiate the discussion. We will sort out the keypoints of Solapur as a good article | |||
| ] (]) 12:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Double game? == | |||
| I noticed the report you filled and then noticed how you vouched and supported the sock again so it maybe a case of double dealing a smart move nonetheless but please report socks of Pakistani AND INDIAN users be truly neutral.] (]) 21:04, 3 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Indo-Pak articles == | |||
| I think you should strongly consider contributing to articles that do not involve a convergence of India-Pakistan issues. Your name is appearing far too often in disputes that have distinct nationalist themes, which means that you are drawing a lot of attention to yourself in a manner that will not end well. You'll end up blocked or topic-banned and that isn't good for you or for the encyclopaedia. I'm guessing you have already been notified of the ] sanctions, so you should be aware that you are skating on very thin ice. | |||
| Please can you try avoiding such articles for a while at least? I can't make you do that but I've been around long enough to know that some admin will enforce it soon unless you make the decision yourself. - ] (]) 21:10, 3 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :I have not accused Human of socking just associating himself with banned users which makes me suspicious of his "Neutrality" claims. ] (]) 21:12, 3 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::As they say, behind/inside every sock, there's a 'Human' hand.This IKG doesnt seem legit, but it has a point, why is it that every sock that was banned during the past week had Human3015's support?? 'Neutrality' goes both way, does it.—] <sup>] </sup> 21:21, 3 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{ec}} This section has nothing to do with you, I-k-g or TripWire, but for what it is worth, I doubt that many experienced contributors here think Human3015 is neutral: it's just that there are equally non-neutral people on the other "side" of these nationalist disputes.<p>By the way, I think all of you should perhaps take a read of ]. There is something odd going on and if any of you are in breach of that policy then you need to go back to using your original accounts '''now'''. I'm fed up of a lot of things related to Misplaced Pages at the moment but the duplicity of time-wasting sock- and meatpuppets is very high on my list. Such people don't do ''anyone'' any favours, regardless of their viewpoint regarding nationalist issues or indeed anything else. - ] (]) 21:23, 3 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Dear Sir, this section have everything to do with me. Would you be kind enough to search how often does Mr Human involve me in his discussion and get (unnecessarily) involved in my discussions? Latest example is . Why would he bring me into someone I had no clue about?? —] <sup>] </sup> 21:31, 3 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::(ec){{u|Sitush}}, thanks for your suggestion, but in my last 500 or 1000 edits show my one controversial or POV edit. And which users highlighting my name? only some IPs and new users (probable socks of banned or existing users) who keep on attacking my talk page, thats why my talk page was semi-protected for a week recently. And don't blame me for being a nationalist, see my contribution, I have been active on various wikiprojects, my edits are always sourced, I report vandals of "all sides". Those new users who are blaming me should give one evidence where I supported established socks. --]] • 21:32, 3 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::{{ec}}His comment to you was correct (if not technically legit for being a sock), to stop acting on the say of such banned editors or commenting in agreement (simply use common sense), something I advised you of before. But he's obviously a sock... I've reported IKG to SPI as a sock of Nangparbat. I hope you will now realize that I actually do report whatever blatant socks I come across (I just don't do witch hunts). --<span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">] (])</span> 21:39, 3 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::::] you were hell bent on adding Original Research on this article Human3015 your not so innocent as you pretend to be. ] (]) 21:36, 3 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Anyway, Indian Karate Girl. As far as "Anti Pakistan Sentiment" article is concerned, see deep edit history, it was not just me but many other "neutral" editors were restoring that version, originally that version was deleted by sock of Nangparbat(expient00), it was sourced version. --]] • 21:45, 3 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| TripWire and TopGun, you're both topic-banned, please discontinue this discussion. ] ] 21:47, 3 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:36, 4 July 2015
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |